Commons:Deletion requests/File:Centralistanbul Boats philippelemoine.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio. The article 40. of the Turkish copyright allows "FoP" only for works of fine arts permanently placed on public streets, avenues or squares. Those are modern artworks which are settled in SantralIstanbul (Category:Santral Istanbul).
- File:Centralistanbul Boats philippelemoine.jpg
- File:Santral Istanbul 1090119 1090141.jpg
- File:Santral istanbul 1090431 1090434.jpg
- File:Santral istanbul ext1.JPG
- File:Santral istanbul ext2.JPG
- File:Sunset at Santral Istanbul.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - nonsense. Subtropical-man (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment These are modern artworks. But nobody mentioned modern artworks at "nonsense". Takabeg (talk) 23:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. You do not understand what's going on. For example, Eiffel Tower is also modern artworks and also French law prohibits the publication of this BUT Wikimedia is not France, servers of Wikimedia not lies in France and Wikimedia not need comply with French law. This is international project, not French. In Spain, Poland, Australia and in 100 other countries, French law not applicable. To pictures of France you can add a note about FOP, and do not delete files. Subtropical-man (talk) 17:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: 1, 4, 5, and 6 are "permanently placed" in a public area. They are in a university campus which is also open to people who are not students. This area is also a public open air concert & event venue. You cannot just comment on a law only "literally", you need to see the "reasoning & sense" of the law as well. This is a globally accepted law practice: en:Letter and spirit of the law & en:Purposive approach. In this specific case, the law is actually talking about art work in public places. I have checked with a lawyer and got the same comment. İyivikiler... ho? ni! 06:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: The subjects are just part of the interior and exterior shots in that place. If you are trying to be strict about these kind of shots please suggest blurring or pixelating those parts of picturesinstead of DR. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Covered by FOP. Sculptures and buildings permanently situated in a public place, except File:Santral Istanbul 1090119 1090141.jpg which is original and in interior. For File:Santral istanbul 1090431 1090434.jpg, I don't see what could get a copyright here. Yann (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)