Commons:Deletion requests/File:Battle of Brega.ogv

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle_of_Brega.ogv

No permission for licence art libre or any other free licence. D.W. (talk) 16:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Delete, agree, was on my watchlist and if you not nominated it I would have tagged it again with {{subst:npd}} giving the uploder more information (if the uploader is the IP who added the 'permission'). The release in http://i53.tinypic.com/afbhqh.png, added last, is not a free license release, also combined with the first 'permission' http://i55.tinypic.com/2jg9w5c.png it is not free. The copyright holder should send a valid permission to OTRS. --Martin H. (talk) 16:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

• •  Keep, Look, I asked the guy if i could use his footage for creative commons, you didnt allow the first thing i said so i sent him another question, he said it was okay, he told me it was footage and I thought i was given the "ok".

Cowik (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

"To think" something is OK don´t mean "to know" something is OK...Commons needs a clear "to know".--D.W. (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't know what your saying. Explain more? Cowik (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Keep, He gave some legitimate proof of permission. I don't see a reason to delete this. 24.85.69.104 02:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Keep, This is just really silly... Cut the guy some slack, this guy is new here and he did some real proof that he could use this video. 207.6.34.122 00:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Delete - no clear permission at all. Off2riorob (talk) 22:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

He has a image of him and the owner of the video talking about using the video in his permission, what other proof do you need? 207.6.34.122 01:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

We need correct permission, not some unconfirmable claim, this footage has been lifted from some news channel and unofficially uploaded to the Internet and now uploaded here, with some weak claim that the person that uploaded it to the Internet owns the copyright. Also please sign into your account and comment and multiple votes are against policy. Off2riorob (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Off2riorob, I not considered so far that even the author information is wrong, but yeah, it is most likely wrong. The youtube uploader is "spreading some videos about the libyan people's current uprising" - not his own videos. Therefore we have a wrong author information here and a insufficient permission from someone who is not the copyright holder. --Martin H. (talk) 23:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

...not the copyright holder but only spreading videos, something that not only ibnomar2005 is doing but also TelLieVision2 (March 2), MeddiTV (March 2), duudeabidez & realhistory100 (March 3) among many others. --Martin H. (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Keep permission given by the author (see link) --Wikieditoroftoday (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Delete No evidence the creator allows usage under this specific license. Hekerui (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

---

Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)