Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banco di Sicilia Logo.png
Above TOO. Individual nomination further to procedural close — Racconish 💬 09:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment This was already deleted and restored due to someone in the original deletion request saying "COM:TOO Italy is not clear. Kept until more info or precedents are found." Which as far as I know still applies and when I made Racconish aware of it in procedural close their response that the file should be deleted anyway because of the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle shouldn't be used to de-facto justify deletion of anything that can't be shown to meet the threshold of originality in Italy though. Especially since from what I understand Italy has a semi high bar for what constitutes an original work and in this case it's just a glorified text logo with a couple of basic geometric shapes. Which is not original. Otherwise, it's on Racconish to say exactly how it is and how it goes against the TOO rules in Italy. Otherwise, the file should be kept. In the meantime, there's zero evidence that COM:TOO Italy has been clarified to the point where basic logos can be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- See here and here, particularly section 5 on the new article 239 of the Italian copyright law. — Racconish 💬 09:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Racconish: Instead of expecting people to read through an extremely long 9 paragraph article without saying how you think it applies can you just cite the exact part that you think is relevant and how you think it is instead? Because just glancing over section 5 of the new article 239 of the Italian copyright law I don't see how it's relevant. Especially since logos aren't industrial designs. Which is what the law seems to apply to. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment BTW, section 5 of the new article 239 of the Italian copyright law repeatedly says that it applies to works created through industrial "manufacturing." In no way does this logo have anything to do with industrial manufacturing. The logo isn't an industrial manufactured product and it's not a logo for one either. So there's literally zero connection, even remotely, between this logo and what the law is about. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO Italy threshold of originality is low in italy. It is always a bit subjective, but I think this logo is also above threshold. --Ellywa (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
