Commons:Deletion requests/File:Argentina-Holanda 1978.jpg
Copyright is claimed by AFP, the Argentine PD claim is not verified. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete proof for {{PD-AR-Photo}} is missing. --High Contrast (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Keep I have checked this image at the publication "La fotografía en la Historia Argentina" (in Spanish, "Photography in the History of Argentina", a production that shows photographs of key events from Argentine history), IV issue, ISBN 950-782-646-7. This precise photo is located at the 448 page, and the source is clearly stated to be the Clarín newspaper. Actually, I did not scan the photo, I took a copy from somewhere else in the internet, but that's intrascendent: the photo itself is there. Two sources that provide contradictory origins. Someone is clearly lying. Who should we trust? The printed publication, from the country where the photo was generated, wich has an academic or divulgative purpose, is printed by a major print house and had the material checked before publication? (the credits attribute photographic and documental investigation to Abel Alexander, and list the complete number of sources employed in the selection and publication of photographs) Or the foreign web site that's selling the image, claiming it to be of its property? I strongly believe in the first option. And if being a printed publication is a problem because you can't check it with your own eyes, I can easily scan it (everythin in the page, photo, description and credits), upload it somewhere else and show it. Belgrano (talk) 23:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Keep The information given at the referred website is completely wrong. The photo was not taken in 2008, but in 1978. The description is misleading since it suggests that this picture was taken in 2008. AFP cannot have a copyright of this picture from 2008 because it entered in the public domain before 2008. By the way, Mario Kempes was 54 years old in 2008. --Commonlingua (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Typos happen. Syntax errors, especially obvious ones like this, don't necessarily invalidate the copuyright claim. Perhaps I should have provided this link? Ytoyoda (talk) 01:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- The copyright claim is completely invalid because this picture was taken in 1978 in Argentina, and according to the Argentine law, this picture is in the public domain.--Commonlingua (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- But only if it was first published in Argentina, or the copyright is owned by an Argentine outlet (hence, the wording "registered" in Argentina). If the copyright claim by AFP is valid, then the Argentine law would not apply. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- The copyright claim is completely invalid because this picture was taken in 1978 in Argentina, and according to the Argentine law, this picture is in the public domain.--Commonlingua (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- And that's the case with Clarín. I've also checked the other pictures. Almost all of them say "2008 AFP". Probably AFP published these pictures on its online version in 2008 (30th anniversary). Someone must have uploaded them to gettyimages.com, without knowing that they were already in the public domain. --Commonlingua (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Keep Correct license selected. Luispihormiguero (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. 99of9 (talk) 12:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
