Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anis Modiste.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete as something more problematic than no commercial Indonesian FOP: incomplete metadata bears Facebook transmission code. Most likely previously published there, and proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)- FOP or no, it's a useless spam image (as File:Merima murid menjahit.jpg and File:Tujuan.jpg, by the same uploader, all advertising the same Indonesian dress shop), and should be deleted as not within COMMONS:SCOPE. DS (talk) 12:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- @DragonflySixtyseven: whether or not it is in scope, since it is a Facebook-sourced image it must be deleted anyway. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- The problem with focusing on the provenance issues rather than the out-of-scopeness is that provenance issues can, in principle, be remedied. We could give the uploader false hope, they could go to the trouble of contacting VRT with a proper release, etc etc etc... and the image would still be spam and out of scope. DS (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @DragonflySixtyseven: whether or not it is in scope, since it is a Facebook-sourced image it must be deleted anyway. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per DS, out of SCOPE. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (plus the other two images mentioned, even though they weren't specifically nominated). —howcheng {chat} 02:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
