Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alumni 2009 Mecanica Timisoara.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alumni 2009 Mecanica Timisoara.jpg

Romania has limited FoP (see {{NoFoP-Romania}}). I believe this work is a substantial recreation and doesn't fall under de minimis. $M_{101}^{atr1x-}$ {_user^page! | _t^a_l^k!} 14:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

• I think it's relevant to say that User:Turbojet has used the email a user function to email the following:

Sun, 20 Nov • 19:15 Wikimedia Commons email from user "Turbojet"

Hello,

Regarding this deletion proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Alumni_2009_Mecanica_Timisoara.jpg You do not know Romanian law in detail. I think that as a member of the VRT for Romania I know the Romanian law very well. In Romanian law, the "de minimis" notion does not exist. "No FoP in Romania" applies only if the building that appears in the photo is the main subject of the image, i.e. it is a photo of the building or artwork, not of anything else subject, and only one building or artwork appears in the image, because if there are two or more it cannot be determined which of them is the main subject.

But I won't argue in the Commons, because I don't talk to those there anymore. The administrators of the Commons, if they want to keep their position, are obliged to use their rights, that is, to delete. As a result, they ignore virtually any argument, as if they were brainless.

Turbojet

-- This email was sent by Turbojet to Matr1x-101 by the "Email this user" function at Wikimedia Commons. If you reply to this email, your email will be sent directly to the original sender, revealing your email address to them. To manage email preferences for user ‪Turbojet‬ please visit <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Mute/Turbojet>;.

•  Keep Citing the mentioned template, I think this is 'an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject"'. Gikü (talk) 15:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
• Keep. Given the statement of Romanian law given in the template, and the clear intent of the photographer and the actual focus of the image, the photograph is of the faculty (being “the main represented or handled subject”) in front of a background, here a building (which is an “accessory” and non-material part of the image). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

---

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)