Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alle tiders duster - Båndet går!.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (cover) Sreejith K (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I made this cover myself, I hold the copyright. --Eirik1231 (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not really. The copyright of this cover is owned by Maxell. If the text is too simple, we might be able to keep it here, otherwise it is a copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- What do you mean “If the text is too simple”? --Eirik1231 (talk) 15:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- If it not creative enough to attract a copyright, then it comes under De minimis. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The original text on the box is purely functional, it's not like it's a creative advertisement. It's ment for the audio professional who knows what he needs, it's just specs. --Eirik1231 (talk) 01:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's what I am thinking too. May be we should Keep this image.--Sreejith K (talk) 02:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- The original text on the box is purely functional, it's not like it's a creative advertisement. It's ment for the audio professional who knows what he needs, it's just specs. --Eirik1231 (talk) 01:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- If it not creative enough to attract a copyright, then it comes under De minimis. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Not looking at text, the pattern behind them seems complex enough that it might be copyrightable.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:00, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- The pattern alone definitely wouldn't meet the threshold of originality. --Eirik1231 (talk) 16:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- This should not have been marked as minor. On what grounds are you making that argument?--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- The pattern alone definitely wouldn't meet the threshold of originality. --Eirik1231 (talk) 16:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Prosfilaes. Yann (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)