Commons:Deletion requests/File:20170315 003801 Kristina Pimenova 576x768.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Elle devrait être supprimée parce que ella a les cheveux longs Arielraiponce (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep, just because the subject of the photograph has a different hairstyle now doesn't mean that this photograph isn't useful. It can be realistically used in a newspaper article about how she used to look at the time of filming of one of her motion pictures. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)- Keep, frivolous deletion request. Her hairstyle hasn't changed btw. Guido den Broeder (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete - While the nomination rationale is nonsense, this appears to be a copyvio - low res, higher resolutions available elsewhere and is clearly part of this 2017 set (i.e., before Commons upload) related to this film. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please don't randomly accuse people. This is not a copyright violation. I am the photographer and executive producer of the film. Your 'higher resolution elsewhere' is not of higher resolution. Guido den Broeder (talk) 01:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've not accused you of anything, nor have I made comments "randomly" or without basis. It is, for example, also factual that you are a demonstrable liar currently evading at least five global locks ([1][2][3][4][5]). That may perhaps be relevant to evaluating your purports. Эlcobbola talk 03:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Your false accusation is still standing above and now you've added more. I am clearly not globally locked since I'm editing here, nor is there any reason to do so as I've never violated any rule on any Wikimedia project Furthermore, I've only ever edited in my own name just like I have on non-Wikimedia projects. You are the liar here, acting in a way unbecoming of an administrator. Guido den Broeder (talk) 03:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've not accused you of anything, nor have I made comments "randomly" or without basis. It is, for example, also factual that you are a demonstrable liar currently evading at least five global locks ([1][2][3][4][5]). That may perhaps be relevant to evaluating your purports. Эlcobbola talk 03:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please don't randomly accuse people. This is not a copyright violation. I am the photographer and executive producer of the film. Your 'higher resolution elsewhere' is not of higher resolution. Guido den Broeder (talk) 01:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Does anyone have a valid deletion rationale here that might be relevant to a DR? No? Then we close this, that's how it works.
- A case could be made that this requires OTRS. It's probably the IP of some film production company (even if photographed by Guido) and being an executive producer doesn't grant an automatic right to the company's assets. Recording this through OTRS (even if that's just Guido sitting in a folding chair with "Producer" on the back of it) would make it clear.
- Anything else belongs at AN/UP Andy Dingley (talk) 11:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment Arielraiponce has been blocked for repeated uploads of non-free Pimenova images. Can someone please close this revenge request? Guido den Broeder (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
