Commons:Deletion requests/File:Конверт Транссибирская магистраль.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Psychonaut as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Scan of non-free envelope artwork Yann (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Going to proper DR as per Commons:Village pump#Speedy deletation is beeing too speedy or some doesnt understand the policy !?. Yann (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete unless we get the source of all images and a written permission. Yann (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)- Delete absent confirmation from the publisher (Почта России) that the uploader is the photographer and copyright holder. —Psychonaut (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Again as in others, all photos of me, drawing of path made in software. one is here. Other is probably in Flickr but not on Commons. Logotype is of Post of Russia, which isnt under copyrigth. Also Russian PTT has manual envelopes program, individuals can create them...Print-convert.ru. This one is very original. --Mile (talk) 13:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Print-convert.ru doesn't appear to be operated by Russian Post, and none of the sample custom envelopes on that site show the Russian Post logo. Did you add this logo yourself to make it appear as though your stationery was published by Russian Post? —Psychonaut (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I put it.
And here is why i could so :
Paragraph 5
Copyright shall not apply to ideas, concepts, principles, methods, processes, systems, means, solutions of technical, organizational and other problems, discoveries, facts, programming languages.
This logo is not under copyrigth.
--Mile (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as a forgery with no educational value. Out of scope and almost certainly constitutes passing off or some other violation of applicable trademark laws in Russia and Florida. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep I am sorry to hear Psychonaut opinion, i think your vote is due to your missundersating and lack of policy understanding. No copyvio, this photos shouldnt end here at all. Some supervision of user should be done, if i see well user has just 5-6 editions on Commons. --Mile (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- You have admitted to taking someone else's imprint and affixing it to your own product in a manner which suggests that they are the author or publisher. This is known variously as "forgery", "counterfeiting", or "passing off", and is civilly and/or criminally actionable in all relevant jurisdictions. If you don't see how this is wrong, consider how you would feel if someone obtained a scan of your signature (which, like the Russian Post logo, is also in the public domain), used it to sign various documents that you didn't create, and uploaded them here. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above: no source, no permission, may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
