Commons:Deletion requests/Copyrighted images from the National Churches Trust Flickr account

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted images from the National Churches Trust Flickr account

[edit]

There was a discussion back in 2020 (VP) (Deletion request) about CC-BY Flickr uploads from the National Churches Trust, which turned out to include several Crown Copyright images and others under copyright from other creators. I have not done an exhaustive search but there are probably others with issues given the prevalence of images uploaded with copyright labels. Note: two of these were flagged the first time round and not deleted; I can’t figure out whether this is because they were OK or whether they were overlooked.

I think this Flickr account should also be flagged as a problematic source. Dogfennydd (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep these two, which came from Geograph Britain and Ireland. I've corrected their licences.
--bjh21 (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, thanks for the research. Dogfennydd (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:St Michael and All Angels, Upper Sapey, WR6 6XR (copyright TudorBarlow (Flickr)) (1) (18270422544).jpg, which came from https://www.flickr.com/photos/tudorbarlow/9688422168 and is non-free. --bjh21 (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the Crown Copyright images, but
 Keep the other images. 'Copyright' or '(c)' in the file name or EXIF or decription does not indicate a copyright violation and is compatible with a Creative Commons license. The issue here is whether the National Churches Trust should be trusted to have obtained the consent of the copyright holder to the license. The NCT is a highly reputable organisation and we should trust their licenses unless there is a clear reason not to, in the same way that we would trust licenses applied by a major museum or a university library. User:Fæ commented in the Village Pump discussion "Where the named photographer seems to have agreed the CC license, presumably because they were supporting/work for the NCT, this seems a reasonable rationale to accept the license as verified, regardless of what may persist in the EXIF data."[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all except the struck-through photos from Geograph. I don't think the NCT has taken much care over the licensing of its uploads to Flickr. If it's licensed Crown Copyright photos as CC-BY it seems unlikely that it's got the licensing right for its other photos – at least, its other photos of churches; its photos of people are another matter because they usually seem to have been taken at NCT events or are publicity photos of its most notable members. I've created Category:Files from The National Churches Trust Flickr stream to get a sense of the situation; so far it's got 400 images. This (Flickr version) and this (Flickr version) are CC-BY-SA photos it's republished as CC-BY. "FROM WEB" in this filename (Flickr version) doesn't inspire much confidence. I'm inclined to agree that the account should be flagged as a problematic source, except for photos taken at NCT events and perhaps for its photos of people associated with the organisation. Ham II (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, per nomination and Ham II, kept only the two from Geograph UK. --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]