Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Harikalar Diyari
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
it's all derivative work --Rtc 08:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- But there is freedom of panorama, I think? --Grandy02 08:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sure there is, but it does not apply to these pictures, since what they show is not "located on public ways, streets or places" but in a park. "Public" does not mean owned by public institutions, but it means open to the public without restrictions such as admission. --Rtc 18:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what the law says in Turkey, but in the UK freedom of panorama is not restricted even if there is an admission fee. It specifically incudes 'a place to which the public has access'. --MichaelMaggs 20:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- On the page of this picture and on the category page, the uploader Nevit added the information "Public Amusement Park". --84.188.112.81 22:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- 'has access' means access without restrictions such as admission. Adding "public" to "amusement park" won't change anything about the situation. Please stop to try to find ways to circumvent copyright; there is no such way. And no, it doesn't matter whether Mickey Mouse is printed on a T-shirt, which you bought with your own money and which is worn by yourself while you're walking in a public place, loudly reciting the GFDL. That doesn't at all give you the right to take a picture of the T-shirt, cut out Mickey Mouse and upload it as "free" material. Nothing you'll ever do, whether you draw Pikachu with your own crayons or sculpt a giant Sailor Moon figurine, will ever lead to the point where you magically turn copyrighted material into "free" material. (COM:DW) --Rtc 09:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- And if you can go in and out every time without admission (and it isn't closed in the night)? I don't know about that park, Nevit should take part in this discussion and tell what he does mean with "Public". By the way, the park has its own site [1]. --Grandy02 15:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care if the photo's are deleted or not, but to clarify the situation the park is govermantal owned, installed by municipality of Ankara, open 24/7 and admitted publicly without a fee. --Nevit 06:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is simply not the usual panorama freedom like a permanently installed statue on the streets. Go ahead if you want to research the issue further about opening hours etc., but please keep in mind that even if it is open 24/7, this is still a corner case. --Rtc 15:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- And if you can go in and out every time without admission (and it isn't closed in the night)? I don't know about that park, Nevit should take part in this discussion and tell what he does mean with "Public". By the way, the park has its own site [1]. --Grandy02 15:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what the law says in Turkey, but in the UK freedom of panorama is not restricted even if there is an admission fee. It specifically incudes 'a place to which the public has access'. --MichaelMaggs 20:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sure there is, but it does not apply to these pictures, since what they show is not "located on public ways, streets or places" but in a park. "Public" does not mean owned by public institutions, but it means open to the public without restrictions such as admission. --Rtc 18:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete the Smurfs and the Flintstones. I don't know where all the characters come from, it should be sorted out. For example Rotkäppchen is public domain, no? / Fred Chess 10:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- The character is in the public domain; yet of course to make a statue out of it results in a new copyright (on the statue, not the character), since it clearly introduces new creative elements beyond the character as such. --Rtc 15:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
withdrawn. --Rtc 15:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)