Commons:Deletion requests/Bad quality photos of Harelbeke

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Bad quality photos of Harelbeke|year=2024|month=December|day=20}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Bad quality photos of Harelbeke|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Bad quality photos of Harelbeke}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality photos of Harelbeke

[edit]

I want to delete my following underexposed photos from the Wikimedia Commons. These photos are of bad quality and do not meet our standards for displaying high-quality content. --Tomaatje12 (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I looked at a few, and while some are underexposed and some are overexposed, none of the ones I looked at were unusable. I might support a courtesy deletion of a few of the worse ones, but I'm really reluctant to support deleting this many usable photos and vote to  Keep these, so as to oppose a blanket deletion of all of them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ikan Kekek. These have been on Commons too long for simple courtesy deletion without other factors. Some photos have shadows (hard to avoid unless photographing on a properly overcast day) but are still illustrative of their subjects. From a sample none are "bad quality" and some do not seem problematic at all. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]