Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/01/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Wrong created Waihorace (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. FYI, you can probably use {{Speedy}} for things like this. Wknight94 talk 22:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
For 2 pictures of porn on Wikimedia Commons. --RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk · contribs) correct malformed DR. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. See Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Avril1975 Captain-tucker (talk) 17:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
middle structure is wrong, correct alternative exists. Yikrazuul (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Info Please consider also this structure to be deleted. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. NEURO ⇌ 22:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
The song "Blue Suede Shoes" was written by Carl Perkins, who died in 1998. The song is still copyrighted. J Milburn (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment The composer's death date should not matter for US copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- And why's that? It means that the lyrics of the song are still within copyright? J Milburn (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- I really have no idea (US copyright on music is horribly messy, not something that I want to get into), but death dates were not important in the US for works created before 1978. This seems to be the recording of a 1950's live broadcast - might very well be free. The Internet Archive certainly knows these thing better than you or me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- The recording cannot be free if the lyrics aren't... You're gonna have to provide more than mere assertions. J Milburn (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- I really have no idea (US copyright on music is horribly messy, not something that I want to get into), but death dates were not important in the US for works created before 1978. This seems to be the recording of a 1950's live broadcast - might very well be free. The Internet Archive certainly knows these thing better than you or me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Anyway it wasn't explained why this pre-1972 recording is free. Trycatch (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- And why's that? It means that the lyrics of the song are still within copyright? J Milburn (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment First of all Peter Kuiper is right that the author's death date is irrelevant for US works (and will be until at least 2018). He's also right that copyright for sound recordings pre-1972 are immensely complex. However, copyright for written works, such as the music and lyrics to this song, are not so complex; they are in the public domain if one of {{PD-1923}}, {{PD-US-no notice}}, or {{PD-US-not renewed}} applies. If none of these apply, the music and so the derivative recording is non-free. If the uploader can demonstrate that at least of these applies for the written music, that still leaves the copyright of the recording, which will depend on the state and various other information we don't have yet. Dcoetzee (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
This is a speedy, as a copyvio. The copyright to the music and lyrics by Carl Lee Perkins was renewed in 1984, registration #RE0000197314 / 1984-03-08. It is very easy to search the US Copyright Database for entries after 1978, particularly when you have distinctive title and author names. Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
This photo is sent by me. I do not know how to reset the editing history and now it looks bad... -robsuper (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Keep, i see no reason for deletion. --ŠJů (talk) 16:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The file history simply looks poor (2 useless parts) and this is the only reason for deletion of this file. I'm going to upload it again. Is there any administrator who is able to clear file history without its deletion ? --robsuper (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. I've cleaned up the history. Trycatch (talk) 08:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
because I uploaded a preferred version with another name Leovanderven (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Available as File:Ovaloc1wb.jpg. --Leyo 22:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Personal photo of an unknown person (used in w:fr:Marc-Alexandre Nourry which has already been speedy deleted) Orlodrim (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
duplicate image, miss-named Glasshouse 14:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Privacidad --MadriCR (talk · contribs) Correct malformed DR Captain-tucker (talk) 15:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Very low quality, not educative, not encyclopedic. Kyknos (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. unusable poor quality, => out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
uncropped version of File:Wagner-Whitin2.jpg - no foreseeable use, image should be cropped for display Santosga (talk) 18:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
fuzzy Mdupont (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete too low quality to be useful. MKFI (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Out of Common's scope; possible copyright violation Kramer Associates (talk) 23:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope, blatant advertisement George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- File:Helene Schjerfbeck Genesendes Kind.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
This are not photos, license does not apply. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- please delete both, its a mistake. --A. Wagner (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted both of them, undeletion is scheduled for 2017-01-01. --32X (talk) 11:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
this is a copyrighted work and has no proof of permission or valid fair use rationale BMRR (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, as per nom. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I would like to use another photograph B.J.Carmichael (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted * (show/hide) 09:07, 13 January 2011 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:B.J. Carmichael photo.JPG" (Uploader request: change photo) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
picture useless without description 80.228.180.228 10:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Same subject of File:SF1.JPG from the uploader's history, I categorized it accordingly. --Santosga (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:L abf «Cabale!» 09:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
picture useless without description 80.228.180.228 11:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE, private img. –BruTe Talk 12:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Copy vio.--license claims older than 60 years but it is for a 2010 film Kenmayer (talk) 13:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Only action by user of same name as subject, no cat or description, tiny image, out of scope. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted * (show/hide) 18:26, 22 January 2011 ABF (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Orhanbalu.png" (In category Media without a license as of 13 January 2011; no license) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Wrong photo was uploaded, please delete this photo --E54764kenneth (talk · contribs) Correct malformed DR Captain-tucker (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted * (show/hide) 14:56, 20 January 2011 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Lkkc1.jpg" (Wrong Photo was uploaded) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
redirect not needed, nothing links here, and category already emptied --Jordiferrer (talk · contribs)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Upload error. File too large for sharing Balagebalogh (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted uploader request abf «Cabale!» 09:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Error Benjamín Preciado (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Error Benjamín Preciado (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Error Benjamín Preciado (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Obviously non-free image Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Error CEAA-India (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted uploader request abf «Cabale!» 09:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Requested by uploader --David1010 (talk · contribs) Correct malformed DR Captain-tucker (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
unused photo of band with no notability, related article was created superimposed on this article [1] and promptly reverted Santosga (talk) 20:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:PS abf «Cabale!» 09:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
it is copyrighted and not mine Underworldtm314 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC) mistake ignore
Kept the whole request appears to be nonsense abf «Cabale!» 09:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted and not mine Tylermccluney (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted * (show/hide) 16:55, 14 January 2011 EugeneZelenko (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Wknoll.gif" (Copyright violation: School logo. Not text only) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work, the copyright of the image on the wrapper/carton is not tranferred to the photographer. — ξxplicit 00:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
182.178.176.173 03:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
No reason given
The above user has tagged this image for deletion but given no reason. This deletion request should be denied and the image left intact. Hari Singh (talk) 11:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
No reason for DR given, nothing obviously wrong, therefore Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The uploader typed the following on the original image at Wikipedia (w:File:SmallStPetersAthlone.jpg):
- The image at the top of this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Specifically, it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/2.0) 2.0, colloquially known as "cc-by-nd-nc".
The image was not deleted from Wikipedia for a while because it was uploaded in 2004, and there was a grandfathered clause which prohibited nc-nd images from speedy deletion (which clause no longer exists). Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
slovakia cyprus estonia - have to be green colored 80.87.209.10 09:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, this map is accurate for 2007 (Slovalkia, Cyprus, Estonia were not concerned at that date, Please read the legend !). The file is dated in its name (and there are articles showing the evolution of the Eurozone with mulitple maps side by side). Another map can be created for other years of adoption. verdy_p (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- And this map is also used in at least 2 editions of Wikipedia (including one about the history of currencies, this is why it is dated). verdy_p (talk) 04:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. per verdy_p Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status not entirely clear. The picture is published on a webpage of the National Park Service, but it was not made by the NPS SEM (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Why do you think it was not made by the NPS? The source seems to indicate it was a National Park Service (Division of History, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation) project and publication from 1968. The maps were done by a Harry Scott. Seems accurate to me. Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I just realized that I confused something. I thought the map was from Jerome A. Greene's "Nez Perce Summer, 1877: The US Army and the Nee-Me-Poo Crisis", parts of which are also published on the NPS-pages. However, as you correctly pointed out, the map is from John Dishon McDermott's book, which was apparently written for the NPS. Hence, the map need not be deleted. --SEM (talk) 14:56, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Albinson died in 1971[2], it's unclear where this 1931 image was first published, so there's no evidence it's PD Prosfilaes (talk) 11:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- I got the image from the book "Religious Aspects of Swedish Immigration: A Study of Immigrant Churches", published in 1932. http://books.google.se/books?id=Vd4Ghoj0dF0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Religious+aspects+of+Swedish+immigration&source=bl&ots=pppv8dqR9m&sig=Zw1cfAqm5f080XsP96leFlLe90k&hl=sv&ei=F-guTYL5N4vNjAeJqYWDBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
We have material taken from a 1969 reprint of a 1932 book published by the University of California. Both the reprint and the original have notices. However, I do not find a renewal for the 1932 work, so it appears that the 1932 copyright lapsed. The 1969 copyright therefore covers only new material, in this case only the cover design. Also, Google shows the whole book, which indicated that it believes the book is PD. Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
this image has the same name of another in wiki Sullivan (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not understand the reason given. However, the image has a watermark
- "(C) Valentina Barbera"
which suggests that it is copyvio, as the uploader is not Barbera. Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version three times and it still does not change the picture. I want to delete the site and create it anew. Daniel Korelko (talk) 11:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I strongly suspect that this was caused by user's failure to clear his computer's cache after the upload, see Wikipedia:Bypass your cache. Note that the history shows multiple uploads of the same image.
It is an error that many of us have made more than once. Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
no description, no source, no author 80.228.180.228 11:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
No real source of the photo, nor any date, so license is unreliable. FunkMonk (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Original uploader says this is only available for certain uses which is in contrast to the Creative Commons tag s/he used. Wknight94 talk 12:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Original upload at en.wp indicated the picture was taken by a relative of Ben Boeke and that the upload was under fair use (the text is still in the description here). License needs to be clarified and OTRS permission attached. Wknight94 talk 13:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
All of the leaflet designs are protected by copyright. COM:DW. Adambro (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, having reviewed the policy. Jza84 (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete but I'll re-upload with fair use rationale on Wikipedia. --87.114.112.171 21:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Uploaded here. Tacked "(fair use)" into the name as wikipedia was preventing me from uploading to the same name. --87.114.112.171 21:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Very low quality, watermark, many better images exist. Kyknos (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Image conveys no information due to low resolution. 194.95.59.130 17:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
This version is a fair-use file - under copyright restrictions because it was drawn by a professional and later stored at Civicheraldry.co.uk. Other free versions now exist at commons anyway. Jza84 (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
copyright infringement --Symposiarch (talk · contribs) Correct malformed DR Captain-tucker (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
While this is a pre-1923 photograph and is therefore likely fine in the U.S., according to this link it is a 1914 photo taken in France by Georges Chevalier, who per this book lived from 1882 to 1967. Its French copyright will not expire until 2038. This could be transferred to en-wiki and used with the PD-US-1923-abroad tag. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't want this file on wikimedia, because of the usage rights. Lorenwohl (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand the request -- the license which Lorenwohl gave us may not be revoked. Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
This is almost identical to a marketing photo from the manufacturer (most probably under copyright), year 2001 or earlier: http://web.archive.org/web/20010701212846/www.stenograph.com/images/srt400.jpg It has perhaps been edited a bit, but "own work" is very doubtful. Ryhanen (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio: publication date (Oct. 1957) contradicts claim of PD: expired, life + 70 Kramer Associates (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Redundant, replaced by File:Saint-Croix-Macaw-Distribution.png I fixed both wiki's that used it. KimvdLinde (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
They are different images. Although I prefer the PNG, our policy is to prefer SVG for maps, so we should give editors a choice.Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exhibitionistic nonsense 87.123.103.139 11:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exhibitionistic nonsense 87.123.103.139 11:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exhibitionistic nonsense 87.123.103.139 11:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
with watermark on there, suspect that this is not uploader's original as claimed Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Author: Muir, Ramsay, died 1941, British. This item was published in London in 1911 and not published in the US until 1938, from what I can tell on Google. Thus not PD in Britain until 2012 per {{PD-old-70}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. - Category:Undelete in 2012 - Jcb (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Kinda new to Commons, I'm actually nominating this on behalf of User:OAlexander (is that okay?), who nominated it for speedy deletion. His reason doesn't appear to be a valid speedy deletion rationale, but he may have a point about deleting the image, so I'll bring it up here. I am officially neutral on whether this image should be kept. ECTran71 (talk) 09:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Good Image.
Deleted. - out of scope - Jcb (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- pomylilem plik i tym samym autora Domek31 (talk) 11:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- pomylilem autora Domek31 (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
exhibitionistic nonsense 87.123.103.139 11:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Some may argue, that Commons does not exert censorship. However, written profanity is not tolerated, so why should it be visually? Further to that, in basically all countries images of this type are classified not for common access, or even not classifiable at all. I don't mind nudity, or whatever, but blatant vulgarity of this kind well exceeds the scope of Commons - no education value, no foreseeable use, out of scope OAlexander (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a very strong keep, but it could very well serve educational value by illustrating female urination, a bodily function some people might want to know about. Even if profanity/vulgarity is not tolerated in society, it is tolerated on Commons as stated here and exemplified here or here. We do have lots of pictures of female urination already, making this image less useful, but I don't think it is totally out of the scope of Commons. ECTran71 (talk) 07:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I like it.
- That is not (in my opinion) a valid reason for keeping it. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm not convinced this is simple enough to be PD-shape, and the source says all rights reserved. Wknight94 talk 12:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
As the creator of the logo, and one who is a part of the ACES board, I'm saying it's fine to use. Thedanielhunt17:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you have ownership of the copyright, please send e-mail to the address at COM:OTRS. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 17:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- To clarify, the OTRS e-mail should come from the corporation -- usually such actions come from the Corporate Secretary, in this case, David Sullivan. While Mr. Hunt may be the creator, once he has transferred the work to the organization, it is not his to license here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - PD-textlogo, although a borderline case - Jcb (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
That is not really PD-textlogo (even Jcb admits "borderline"). Permission from copyright holder needed. Saibo (Δ∇) 18:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted 03:01, 14 September 2012 by Fastily, closed by . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The image provides no sources, and there is giant evidence that such flag never existed. The earliest example of this flag appeared in 2006, there never any such flag before. Also, it includes mistakes that every human, who is familiar with Abkhazian or Russian alphabet will note - a) П letter instead of Ҧ and Ъ and I instead of Ы. George, 13:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - heavily in use, Wikimedia Commons is not the place were we discuss if this flag is correct - Jcb (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Image has watermark (Logo from Beethoven-Haus Bonn). Sorry. I mistook the logo for a part of the image. The Logo consists of the initials of Ludwig van Beethoven, using a script font. LeastCommonAncestor (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - we have {{Watermark}} for that - Jcb (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that the author is unknown and no evidence for the date: The image is from AFP according to source, AFP is all visible via gettyimages, http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/51397220/AFP, comparing to other photographs of the same person the photo might be way >1940, the glasses that he also wears on all other 1946 photos may be one eivdence, tha airplane in the back can be another evidence. So: Likely not unknown, the source wasnt consulted, and not old enough. Martin H. (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I have not noticed that this file is from Getty Images. I changed the image to a more copyright-copliable one. Daffy123 (talk)
- Delete The replacement has a (c) on the page and on the particular image. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- I dont see a copyrigth notice on the image, but the replacement is from fr:Roger-Viollet (#40767-2), possibly Henri Roger-Viollet. Reasonable enquiry would require to ask that source. Grabbing images from random websites and claiming that the author d is "unknown" and that the author died 70 years ago is wrong in almost all cases and based only on the sad fact that most information about authors is not online or not known by the particular uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't clear -- I meant that the source page had a (C) and the large image, visible when you click on the thumbnail, also had a (C) -- there is no watermark. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I replaced my original image with an SVG file. File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Kleines Reichswappen 1871.svg --David Liuzzo (talk · contribs) Correct malformed DR Captain-tucker (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
File RJ-45_TIA-568B_Right.png is of much better quality and doesn't use a language. So it's better to use that image Mattias.Campe (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. They are completely separate images. We keep both, and let projects choose which to use. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
There are images that have better quality and give the same information Mattias.Campe (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
No reason given. 88.72.193.60 22:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Possible invasion of privacy (not Loughner's, but the rest of his family). In any case, I'll shortly be uploading a new version with the license plates redacted. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- New version uploaded, and early versions deleted. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note I'm not the photographer, nor anything. I just reverted the image to its. original size. I'd say let's Keep it because a street is a public place, Karp has not been invading anyone's privacy, unless the US law is a bit awkward in this scope. I have seen a picture of the Loughner family house in USA Today, I don't think they are invading their privacy, either. Diego Grez return fire 21:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was an automatic notification, apparently.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The original uploader has requested speedy deletion of the image. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The author tried to upload lower resolution version (~600x400), then (when he was reverted) he tried to revoke the free license and to nominate the picture for speedy deletion. Too bad that the uploader don't want to explain his opinion here. Maybe he could agree with hosting of the lower resolution version? I think it's reasonable to fulfill the uploader's will, because the picture is not used anywhere, and it's important not to alienate volunteers from Commons. Trycatch (talk) 19:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Should the "redacted" photo document that Loughners are some mafiosos that use cars without license plates? Commons should contain realistic photos, not a virtual reality. Restore the original version. --ŠJů (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
