Derivative work without proper attribution (e.g., the photos and logos on page 3). The dw-nsd tag has been removed by the uploader on the grounds that it is not a derivative work. I believe that it is a derivative work (i.e. it includes other works such as photographs) and that they are not properly credited. - 2002:5396:177F:E472:9CAB:A163:AA64:31FF15:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to supply one... The image of Tim Berners-Lee on page 2 is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.5 by Uldis Bojārs, so it's missing attribution. There are more images contained on page 2, 3, 4 and 12 of this document which need attribution of the source images and correct and compatible licensing. Wikimedia Commons licensing policy states: "The information given on the description page should be sufficient to allow others to verify the license status." This is currently not the case and needs to be added. Cheers 2002:5396:177F:E472:9CAB:A163:AA64:31FF19:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, but an existing image of Tim Bernere-Lee on Wikimedia Commons under specific license is not a prove, that the athor havent got a public domain version as for example. Such accusations, should be fixed at the time, when the document is uploaded, not 20 years later. So I would keep the file on Commons. Juandev (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are maybe right, but this is not the right proceduree. I added attributions and licenses for what I could find. For other files the original author may have permission from Ted Nelson, so the proper way would be to request to provide this permisson to OTRS. Not that Ted Nelson's images are free, but his license terms cannot be fullfiled in formats like PDF or PPTX. In the case of other media I havent attached attributions because I havent find metainformation or original files. But all of projects based on free licences like GPL. Juandev (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grave stone images from the Englyn Bedd Facebook group
Images have been flagged by User:Dogfennydd earlier this year, but not listed and uploaders not notified. Reason given is: "Images taken from the same Facebook group uploaded to Commons with CC0 licence, but no CC0 dedication is given in the original source. Uploaders are apparently not the photographers."
Can someone who has Facebook please verify?
Licenses are up to the creator of the work to choose, and are okay as long as they allow for other to (re)use the file and create derivatives from it, and they must permit commercial use.
That said, it is really bad to upload images from other photographers before asking for their permission and desired licensing conditions. Because this step should have been followed first, and the files are already lingering on Commons since July without action, my DR still stands. I would propose for you to first make sure the copyrights are agreed with all the photographers from the images in this set, before we host/restore them. Ciell (talk) 07:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have made an announcement to the group saying I was doing this so permission was granted. I have updated them recently. Please advise what else I can do DR would jepardise a project. Taffronaut1111 (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
_Englyn_Bedd_Grave_Englyn.jpg){kind=link}
