Category talk:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

How should we review?

See discussion at Template_talk:Cc-by-3.0-IndiaFM#IndiaFMreview. --MGA73 (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Note for reviewers and users

If some user find that compared to BH image, high resolution or full-size image is available on other site, then he argues that BH is not copyright holder of that image and he tags image for deletion. Also sometime reviewers assume that if a image on BH site does not have BH watermark, then BH does not hold copyrights of that image. There is much more to BH than what meets the eyes. I have uploaded File:UditNarayan6.jpg from this BH source. On BH, you see half-size image without BH watermark. But same image in full-size can be seen on this site and you can see BH watermark on it and on all the images from the same event. How the site got these full-size images with watermarks from BH, I don't know. I am just posting here for posterity to let reviewers and users know that finding high-res or full-size image on other sites doesn't mean that BH is not copyright holder of that image. Ikshvaaku (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

How would BH files be reviewed now?

The source link given on all BH files on Commons are not working, because Bollywood Hungama administrators have changed the layout of their website completely. How will the remaining BH files (400+) be reviewed now??? Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 08:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Datestamp missing when using prescribed syntax

See Template talk:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama#Datestamp missing. DMacks (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)