User talk:Kernigh
When I edit a page at Commons, it says at the bottom:
- Text must not violate any copyright and must be based on verifiable sources. By editing here, you agree to licence your contributions under the GFDL.
I am not so familiar with the "MediaWiki:" namespace, but it seems that this text results from your edit to MediaWiki:Copyrights. I found this confusing. At one point I thought I was editing English Wikipedia instead of Commons. I would like to request some changes:
- Instead of linking to Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Copyrights, link to Commons:Copyrights. The latter page is superior for explaining copyrights at Commons.
- Remove the text "and must be based on verifiable sources". I could not find any page in the "Commons:" namespace that says to base my text on verifiable sources. Further, the linked pages at English Wikipedia only apply to encyclopedia articles, not to Commons.
I cannot make these changes because the page is protected. Could you make these changes, or otherwise fix the page? --Kernigh 18:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Done. (In the future, it might make more sense to discuss changes at MediaWiki talk:Copyrightwarning, where others will see your comments.) User:dbenbenn 21:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
NetHack game not found
[edit]Your NetHack image messages say that you "can view the game with the ttyplay command by downloading the ttyrec file for 2005-10-22." However, there is no such file in that server in that directory. --ZeroOne 09:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe I gave the wrong date. I will go search for the file. --Kernigh 17:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Bot
[edit]Hallo
There is a template for bots for using it in the babelbox. you only need to add
{{babel-1|bot}}
to the userpage of your bot. With greetings. Augiasstallputzer 13:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Category:NetHack/Kernigh/22oct2005 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
46.132.191.22 12:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Application software has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |