User talk:Christer T Johansson/2015

Kategorier i botaniska

Hej. Jag påbörjade att kategorisera växterna som är fotade i Botaniska trädgården i Göteborg men blev tveksam och pausade. Tycker du de bör kategoriseras efter var de är tagna eller efter vad de är för typ av växt? Jag frågar eftersom du också tagit en del bilder där. För till exempel Dionysior är det enkelt eftersom alla dionysior växer i växthusen medan det för orkideer är lite svårare eftersom det finns ett fåtal utanför växthusen. För vissa växter som växer längs gångarna blir det svårt att kategorisera var de växer. Åsikter? MVH Averater (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Jag tycker du gör ett bra jobb :) Kategorier är inte min starka sida, tyvärr :( C T Johansson (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Habenaria macroceratitis

Hello C T Johansson, I transposed your excellent photos named (by label of botanic garden??) Habenaria macroceratitis to Anacamptis morio subsp. longicornu. Habenaria macroceratitis looks like this: [1]. Best regards. Orchi (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, that was the label beside the plant. And thank you for your excellent move, I really appreciate that! I trust your judgement at the fullest :) Thank you Orchi! C T Johansson (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Unidentified Callistemon

Hello,

Your excellent image, "File:Callistemon sp.-IMG 9178.JPG" is of Melaleuca hypericifolia. Although all Callistemons have now been moved to Melaleuca (I'm working on that in Wikipedia), this species has always been a Melaleuca because the stamens (as can easily be seen in your image) are joined in a bundle or "claw". Please keep up the great photography! Gderrin (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

That's interesting to know. It's ok to rename the file, for me anyway :) C T Johansson (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morpho menelaus-IMG 0825.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinicarpus swobodae-IMG 9032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea-IMG 9025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus sp.-IMG 8910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inula helenium-IMG 8480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinops bannaticus-IMG 8508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Maurandya images

Nice photos, but they are definitely Maurandya barclayana, not M. scandens, which has pink flowers and sepals without hairs. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladiolus hortulanus 'Trader Horn'-IMG 9259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. please check the empty category! --Hubertl 16:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium lancifolium-IMG 9248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia sp.-IMG 9281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Don´t oversharpen the pictures! --Hubertl 15:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar ?

Not deserved, but thank you very much !!! Come on !! Be bold and proud ! New QIs to come for you !--Jebulon (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron orbiculare-IMG 9378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some overexposed parts, but acceptable.--Jebulon 19:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larix × marschlinsii IMG 9382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good.--Jebulon 19:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ageratum houstonianum-IMG 9320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cithaerias pireta-IMG 0700.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyoscyamus albus-IMG 9339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 2309-Passiflora biflora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia sp.-IMG 9282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Quality is OK, but I would prefer more information about the Dahlia or the fly. --C messier 18:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)