User talk:kallerna

Archive:

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

File:SSG Food Market 3.jpg

File:SSG Food Market 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yeongdong-daero 2.jpg

File:Yeongdong-daero 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yeongdong-daero 4.jpg

File:Yeongdong-daero 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-admin discussion opened

As there was consensus on COM:ANU to open this: Commons:Administrators/Requests/Kallerna (de-adminship 2). --A.Savin 01:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As, it is also polite to tell the result of the vote. The result was:keep admin status --Zache (talk) 16:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's really odd...

...that you are trying to reinstate an offensive comment by indefblocked LTA Livioandronico2013. It's clear that you are targeting me with that, and to be honest, seldom in my Wikimedia activity I had seen such childish behaviour by an admin. Regards --A.Savin 00:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is forbidden to remove comments from talk pages, especially if they are related to the user removing the comment. I do not know who is behind the comment. This accusation of me targeting you is quite severe, and I would like you to take it back. —kallerna (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy for you 151.19.162.196 14:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not odd
Nothing odd, in my view, per COM:AGF. But the comment above is rude, "seldom in my Wikimedia activity I had seen such childish behaviour by an admin". Why coming here to infringe COM:CIVIL, at a moment where it is an issue? See "Direct rudeness: belittling a fellow editor". -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very rude....would be him from deadmin. Savin has always been aggressive. 151.47.166.251 17:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ 196.188.225.11 14:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterworks Onkalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmö Kronprinsen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --IM3847 14:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kozjak 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Amazing picture! --Plozessor 05:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Millennium Cross 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka 2024 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Draceane 08:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka 2024 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trollpikken 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gwanghwamun Square 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seokchon Lake 1.jpg

File:Seokchon Lake 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Millennium Cross 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmö Kronprinsen 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and nice – the light makes the (somewhat boring) building interesting. --Aristeas 10:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turning Torso Malmö 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka 2024 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västra hamnen Malmö 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matka2 snow 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trollpikken 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Reichstag dome interior 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel request

Hello, can you please revision delete the old file revision of File:Criticism of CAD (screenshot).jpg since it has a non-free element (windows vista taskvar)? Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —kallerna (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kuvan korvaaminen huonolaatuisella kokonaan eri kuvalla

Hei kallerna ja Jeff G. (Google Translate?). Mlang.Finn tallensi uuden version kuvasta Untomonosenyhtye1959.jpg yhteenvedolla ”Improved quality.” Kuvakoko pieneni Motoparkin tallentamasta alkuperäisestä (3,44 MiB → 248 KiB). Ohje: ”Yleisesti ottaen kuvat kannattaa tallentaa mahdollisimman korkealaatuisina. Kun tallennat korjattua versiota tiedostosta, kirjoita sen vuoksi yhteenvetokenttään kuvaus siitä, mitä muutoksia olet tiedostoon tehnyt.” Käännös on vanhentunut, mutta huomio kuvanlaadusta ja muokkauksen perustelusta ei liene muuttunut. Palautin alkuperäisen kuvan, tiedoston historiassa on kommenttini ”different picture & bad quality.” ja viittaukseni keskusteluun Kuvassa Unto Monosen yhtye laadun muutos. Voiko kuvan palauttaa uudelleen huonompilaatuisella ja kokonaan eri kuvalla ilman kommenttia? Tulisiko kuvan alkuperäinen tallentaja ottaa huomioon tällaisessa muutoksessa (Overwriting existing files)? Minä en enää palauttanut kuvaa, koska se olisi johtanut muokkaussotaan. Keskustelusta Mlang.Finnin kanssa ei ole ollut apua. Mitä mieltä te olette? raid5 22:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC) edit fix wl raid5 13:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Raid5: I warned the user for overwriting and for uploading copyvios. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 01:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMO pidän käyttäjän Mlang.Finn kuvaa parempilaatuisena, resoluutio ei ole ainut mittari. Kuva vaan on tosiaan eri, joten tuo kuva olisi tullut tallentaa omalle sivulleen. —kallerna (talk) 09:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeff G. ja kiitos kallerna. Katsoin lähinnä tukossa olevaa mustaa väriä, mutta se on tosiaan makuasia. raid5 13:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stavanger aerial 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 22:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tunnel end Onkalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality (although a symmetrical crop would be better). --C messier 22:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kozjak 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montserrat Natural Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelldefels beach promenade 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrer A Barcelona 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona view from Montjuïc hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montserrat Natural Park 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montserrat Natural Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagrada Familia Barcelona 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaça de les Palmeres Castelldefels 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaça de les Palmeres Castelldefels 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Aqueduct 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrometeorological Institute Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRT Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial House of Mother Teresa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedestrian bridge Vardar Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lime residue thermal water Katlanovo spa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lime residue thermal water Katlanovo spa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gwanghwamun Square 1.jpg

File:Gwanghwamun Square 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gwanghwamun Square 2.jpg

File:Gwanghwamun Square 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Aqueduct 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nikride 16:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrgadikia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irini Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower 2024 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality but slightly tilted! --Scotch Mist 13:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, maybe better now? --Kallerna 14:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 22:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Cableway Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Moroder 08:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flatiron Skopje 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Oktomvri Skopje 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macedonian Opera and Ballet 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macedonian Opera and Ballet 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Clement Church Skopje 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Macedonia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Oktomvri Skopje 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Clement Church Skopje 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 15:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I think that you overcorrected it a bit --Poco a poco 08:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe better now? --Kallerna 09:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yep, thanks --Poco a poco 21:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millennium Cross Cableway Skopje 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macedonian Philharmonic Skopje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Oktomvri Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Fortress Goce Delchev bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flatiron Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Maybe you could ad {{FoP-Macedonia}} --Moroder 10:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Vitrolles 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brahehus Gränna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024 4 Hours of Le Castellet 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective seems off, particularly for the white pavillions top-left --Mike Peel 06:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 07:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A1 autoroute Lille rain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de Lille 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadis 402 Bordeaux 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieille Bourse Lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille-Flandres station 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille-Flandres station 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chambre de commerce de Lille tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrolles 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calanque de l'Erevine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 16:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrolles 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 20:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euralille 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs geolocation, and I think the sculpture at bottom right violates FoP, see {{NoFoP-France}}. --Grendelkhan 21:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CAs are minors. The minimi can be applied here. --Sebring12Hrs 21:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrolles 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrolles radar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roquefavour Aqueduct 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roquefavour Aqueduct 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roquefavour Aqueduct 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roquefavour Aqueduct 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marseille metro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiki Beach Le Rouet 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License reviewer

Millaisena näkisit lisenssiremmin jäsenyysehdot? Olisiko meikäläisellä jo saumaa hakea mukaan reiveihin? --Geohakkeri (talk) 11:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laita lippulappu menemään, sillähän se selviää. Uskoisin että kyseessä läpihuutojuttu. —kallerna (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yrittänyttä ei laiteta. --Geohakkeri (talk) 12:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympus National Park 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alex Jany pool.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apartment building Vitrolles 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 21:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image Credit

Hi, I want to include your photo of Amager Bakke (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amager_Bakke_4.jpg). I want to credit you by your full name. Could you send me your full name. You can use my work email s.lee@tudelft.nl. If you wish to be identified only as Kallerna, that's OK too. Thanks. Sang. 2A02:2454:4A3:8C00:48B1:5BDA:6A7:1CE3 09:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Goudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulin de Pallières 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Marseille from Notre-Dame de la Garde 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Callelongue calanque 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Longchamp 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. A geocode would help here. --Augustgeyler 15:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality from a privileged PoV. --Terragio67 13:43, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubion 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahara dust Vitrolles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulin de Pallières 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame de la Garde Marseille 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Top of the tower is stretched out, should be fixable though. ReneeWrites 08:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With this kind of perspective and view, that is unavoidable. --Kallerna 09:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the result of perspective correction, but it can be adjusted. To give you an idea of what I mean: https://i.imgur.com/mTgIeRR.jpeg ReneeWrites 14:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can override the current version if you already made the adjustments, please. --Kallerna 15:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done ReneeWrites 09:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Husen Ahmed

0934481624 196.188.225.11 14:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Would be better if the wheels weren't cropped, but still good quality to me. --Benjism89 20:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stage 20 Tour de France 2024 Col de la Couillole 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin-Vésubie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 17:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Colmiane Les Baus de la Frema via Ferrata 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lantosque view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 17:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gordes view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calanque des Eaux Salées 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Colmiane Les Baus de la Frema via Ferrata 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calanque des Eaux Salées 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Palanques Vermelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamariu beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Cardinalis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Cardinalis 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girona Onyar 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verdon Gorge 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ratekreel 20:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verdon Gorge 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 17:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port-Pin calanque 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 17:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Nice view --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port-Miou calanque 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 17:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubaye Jausiers 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake of Serre-Ponçon from D900 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Nice detail view --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En-Vau calanque 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake of Serre-Ponçon from D900 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. Masts on the left side are leaning out. Is some pc possible? --Milseburg 10:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, done. --Kallerna 11:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC) Support OK and QI now. --Milseburg 14:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port-Miou calanque 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verdon Gorge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Sky is a bit over exposed but composition is very impressive, good quality. --Shougissime 19:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erevine calanque 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensuès-la-Redonne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:53, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shores of Ensuès-la-Redonne 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensuès-la-Redonne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shores of Ensuès-la-Redonne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:53, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D952 road Verdon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 11:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 07:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 07:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 07:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillon dam 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pelat + Lake Allos tour 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plage de Carro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Miroir aux Oiseaux Martigues 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Sainte-Madeleine-de-l'Île de Martigues 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Hotel Sanremo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --6uy7t44t 14:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedestrian road Sanremo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Miroir aux Oiseaux Martigues 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unfortunate Lighting -- Spurzem 10:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO the light is really pleasing. --Kallerna 19:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting is definitely better than when I took a picture at the very same place :-) Agree with Kallerna, the lighting creates a warm, pleasant atmosphere. Both lights and shadows have details, no burnt areas. A little noisy, but acceptable IMO. --Benjism89 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church Sanremo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Disturbing shadow in the foreground -- ~~~~
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plage de Carro 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]