File talk:Tyrsenian languages.svg

Relative Chronology

I see some problems in the last version of the map. For example, Raethic inscriptions date from 5th c. BC to 0 AD, but circa 5th century BC, it is not reasonable to consider an extension so great for the Etruscan as that depicted in the map [given that in central Italy, at that time, Sabellian languages were clearly dominant there, as show epigraphic data]. I think we need to fix a specific moment (for example c. 400 a.C.) and then depict the area languages, otherwise we are depicting a map that were not real for any moment in the history. Other drawback of the last version is probably is better to use a map with colors, --Davius (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)