File talk:AWG calculation in Mathcad software.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This file was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2021 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
⚠️ Error
[edit]
⚠️ Again: in row 4, column 2, It's not “area” but “diameter” ratio that is calculated! Compare row 4 to row 8. --50.201.195.170 23:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sinä, IP 50.201.195.170, voit lähettää vastalauseesi vain keskustelusivuille. Tällaiset kommentit eivät kuitenkaan kuulu kuvasivulle. --Mosbatho (talk) 23:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- {Machine translation from Finnish by .170: You can only send your objection to chat pages. Such comments do not belong to the image page.}
- Disagree. Not a rule I'm aware of. And in this case it's appropriate. I notice you are claiming there's a dispute but you haven't actually disputed that there's an error. You mustn't do that. And be civil. --50.201.195.170 23:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- I was always civil. Show me exactly, where I've been unkind to you? --Mosbatho (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Already did. Where you claim that you didn't refuse to communicate, after I had posted links that show you did. Heck, you admit that you didn't communicate, and then justify it. Indeed, if your claim there that "I don't have to reply to pages with which I have nothing to do in terms of content." is a good explanation for your refusal to communicate, then you shouldn't worry about my complaint. --50.201.195.170 05:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- I was always civil. Show me exactly, where I've been unkind to you? --Mosbatho (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Disagree. Not a rule I'm aware of. And in this case it's appropriate. I notice you are claiming there's a dispute but you haven't actually disputed that there's an error. You mustn't do that. And be civil. --50.201.195.170 23:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
