File talk:20210331 Global tree cover loss - World Resources Institute.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
million hectares --> percentage of global tree cover lost?
[edit]"million hectares" means almost nothing to people, which really hurts the value of the chart.
Can you please redo the Y axis to something meaningful? Maybe percentage of global tree cover lost?
Also, "non-tropical" is too light colored, just make it a bit darker so the text is legible.--Efbrazil (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Efbrazil: I couldn't readily find global tree cover estimates, given the rather abstruse definitions of tree cover that might not be consistent with other sources if I were to try to use them to compare to the numbers that this WRI source uses. I added "thousand square miles" on the right vertical axis to be somewhat more graspable. Maybe I should change 'Million hectares' to 'Thousand square kilometers'? I also added a nice chamomile scent; you like?
- I added an "Italy area" indicator
in red (sad the text seems small now—I'm thinking some contextual explanation can be added in the caption when used in articles). RCraig09 (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Better! Maybe changing hectares to square km would be good too- I think that's a more normal measurement to people. --Efbrazil (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)