File:XF11F F9F-9 NAN10-54.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 561 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 225 pixels | 640 × 449 pixels | 1,006 × 706 pixels.
Original file (1,006 × 706 pixels, file size: 249 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionXF11F F9F-9 NAN10-54.jpg | The first Grumman F11F-1 Tiger fighter (BuNo 138604), at that time still designated "F9F-9", taking off on its maiden flight on 30 July 1954. |
Date | |
Source | U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News October 1954 [1] |
Author | USN |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This file is a work of a sailor or employee of the U.S. Navy, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, it is in the public domain in the United States.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 15:11, 4 May 2011 | 1,006 × 706 (249 KB) | Cobatfor (talk | contribs) | clearer version | |
13:08, 11 March 2008 | 532 × 238 (35 KB) | Cobatfor (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description=The first Grumman F11F-1 ''Tiger'' fighter, at that time still designated "F9F-9". A Grumman F9F-8 ''Cougar'' is flying along. The first ''Tiger'', BuNo 138604, flew on 30 July 1954. |Source=U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News October |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
_error | 0 |
---|
Hidden categories: