File:Unfinished Obelisk, Axum (Detail) (3160750074).jpg
Original file (2,770 × 1,830 pixels, file size: 2.59 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionUnfinished Obelisk, Axum (Detail) (3160750074).jpg |
Not only is this Axumite obelisk (or, more correctly, stela) unfinished, it hasn't even been separated from its parent boulder, or matrix. Because this stela is a work in progress that was just in the roughing-out stages when work ceased, I'll refer to it as a stela "blank." I call it a blank because I assume none of the fine carving would have been done until after the stela had been removed from the field and presumably brought to a stone yard for the finish work. It looks like the masons planned to leave a thin rib at the end of the stela to connect that end to the matrix, probably to help support the stella's weight, keep it from settling down onto the matrix, and provide a gap under the stela through which planks, handles or other similar attachment points could be inserted to help move the stela blank to its next location. Realistically, though, I think it would have been necessary to leave supporting ribs at various points along the stela's length. Otherwise, the masons would have risked having the stela blank crack under its own weight. Wouldn't it be interesting to know why work on the stela stopped at this preliminary stage? Did the masons discover a flaw in the stone or accidentally damage it? Were mistakes made during the cutting process that rendered the piece unfit for its intended use? Did the family or group who ordered the stela suffer a reversal of fortune or status? Did they change their minds? Or did external factors, such as changes in funerary practices, war, or foreign conquest, leave this project in a forever-unfinished state? I took this photo on a hillside near Axum where archaeologists believe stelae were quarried during the Axumite Kingdom. The Axumite period in Ethiopian history extends from about 400 BCE to the 10th century of the common era; the Kingdom is thought to have reached its peak between the third and sixth centuries of the common era. Archaeologists believe the stelae in and around the city of Axum mark the tombs of Axumite royals and nobles. If this unfinished stela is representative of Axumite quarrying techniques, it shows Axumite stonemasons cut their stelae blanks from larger pieces of stone - large boulders, actually - that were found scattered on slopes below rock cliffs, having already fallen off the cliffs as a result of ordinary erosional processes. Like the Inka of South America, it appears the Axumites did not quarry stone by cutting directly into solid, living rock where it emerged from the ground or mountainsides. Instead, both cultures quarried stone from boulders that had already become separated from their sources (e.g., cliffs) naturally. |
Date | |
Source |
Unfinished Obelisk, Axum (Detail)
|
Author | A. Davey from Where I Live Now: Pacific Northwest |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 5 October 2012 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:47, 5 October 2012 | 2,770 × 1,830 (2.59 MB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr by User:Elitre |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D70 |
Exposure time | 1/1,000 sec (0.001) |
F-number | f/6.7 |
ISO speed rating | 200 |
Date and time of data generation | 16:34, 31 October 2007 |
Lens focal length | 38 mm |
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh |
File change date and time | 16:34, 31 October 2007 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
Date and time of digitizing | 16:34, 31 October 2007 |
APEX exposure bias | −1.5 |
Maximum land aperture | 4.2 APEX (f/4.29) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 10 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 10 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 10 |
Color space | 0 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 57 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | None |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject distance range | Unknown |