File:The Second Man Within.jpg

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0CC BY-SA 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 truetrue

The is no such a thing as luck, no such a thing as if it is meant to be; it will be. All events exist at some point, so earthquake, accidents, and plane crash all exist at some point. Presentism is out of the picture because we know that tomorrow and past events exist, but did humans construct the future, or did a higher formed it? I indeed respect Rovelli's ideas, who asked if "reality three dimensional and becoming real (Presentism), or is reality four-dimensional and becoming illusory (Eternalism)? Both options raise difficulties. I that we do not need to be trapped by this dilemma. There is a third possibility: reality has a more complex temporal structure than either these two naive options" [16] Time may not be running forward, but backward. Obviously, there is much to learn about our universe and the possible multidimensions and parallel universes. Of course, whether spacetime is an "independent entity" or a context that has a beginning and an but we can affirm that there is no such thing as luck, no such thing as meant to be, it will be." Several approaches divide time into past, present, and future.