File:NRCS HELPS UNION COUNTY, SD FARMER RECLAIM LAND (21864070826).jpg
Original file (2,848 × 4,272 pixels, file size: 5.07 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionNRCS HELPS UNION COUNTY, SD FARMER RECLAIM LAND (21864070826).jpg |
NRCS HELPS UNION COUNTY, SD FARMER RECLAIM LAND By Loretta Sorenson for the Natural Resources Conservation Service PHOTO CAPTION: Native plants on Corio’s easement are providing habitat for pollinators and other wildlife. Photo by Loretta Sorenson for the USDA NRCS South Dakota. NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, Huron, SD, October 2, 2015 –Jefferson farmer John Corio was one of hundreds of South Dakota farmers who helplessly watched Missouri River floodwaters quietly and persistently swallow acres of farmland during the 2011 Missouri River flood. The record high water that spilled over the riverbanks at the end of May 2011 and ravaged some areas along the river into September 2011 were estimated to cost billions of dollars in damage. Missouri River water levels along Corio’s land in southern Union County have always been affected by the upstream operation of the Gavins Point Dam at Yankton. It’s something Corio watched his father deal with and learned to manage once he took over the farm. Corio’s flooded 26-acre tract of cropland along with several acres of pastureland lies at the foot of a 20-foot bluff just west of his farm site. Both he and his father raised crops and hay on the land since the farm was established in 1939. While the land always tended to be wet, the soil was productive and careful management usually netted an acceptable yield. “It wasn’t unusual for changes at Gavins Point Dam to cause water levels here to rise around harvest time,” Corio says. “Then it was challenging to get the crop out.” When the 2011 flood waters came, Corio watched soils he and his father had toiled for years to build up and protect disappear under 10-feet of wayward water. “Once the water finally went down, there was a thick layer of mud all across the field,” Corio says. “Some people had a lot of sand wash in during the flood. For me, it was mud.” As Spring 2012 approached, Corio wasn’t sure how or if he would reclaim the land. As he contemplated his options, he received encouraging news from his local Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) District Conservationist, Jeff Loof. NRCS was offering landowners in Corio’s area an opportunity to enroll land in a special Wetland Reserve Enhancement Program (WREP) perpetual easement designed to help alleviate further erosion of land along the river, restore Missouri River floodplain wetlands and improve wildlife habitat. The easement agreement provided a plan and funding for restoring the land. “John was one of four landowners who took advantage of this specially funded WREP opportunity,” Loof says. “Altogether, more than 600 acres of land adjacent to John’s land in southern Union County that was severely affected by the flood was enrolled in this easement.” Much of the land entered into the easement was covered with up to four feet of sand, which was so deep it hindered reclamation of roads and all reclamation efforts in the area. The eroding, shifting sands began blowing and moving immediately after floodwaters receded. “You can easily see the water line on the cottonwoods that survived the flood,” Loof says. “Dead cedar trees are also very obvious. They didn’t survive the floodwater. Many trees tipped under the pressure of the floodwater’s strong current. After the water went down, some landowners harvested logs from the area.” Once flood waters receded, sand deposition made it unfeasible to farm some of the land. Several irrigation systems and wells were also destroyed in the flood. “John was one of four farmers who worked cooperatively to develop this easement, protecting a total of 600 acres,” Loof says. “They recognized that there was a great benefit to them, to the area and to the nation to preserve this large expanse of Missouri River floodplain. Restored, the area will be important to migrating waterfowl as nesting habitat and to pollinators in this area.” The easement agreement included a one-time per-acre payment to landowners, which Corio invested in some more profitable land tracts on his farm. Enrolled acres were seeded with native plants intended to provide wildlife habitat and natural weed control. Plant selection also included an emphasis on pollinator habitat. The seed mix included many grass species typical of the Tall Grass prairie, such as Big Bluestem, Indiangrass, Switchgrass, Sand Bluestem and Prairie Sandreed. Flowering species included Purple Praireclover, Illinois Bundleflower, Maximillian Sunflower and Prairie Coneflower. Other species suitable for the wetlands areas were also seeded. “Before any reclamation could begin, the ongoing affect of water levels as a result of operations at Gavins Point Dam was thoroughly explored,” Loof says. “We wanted to be certain that reclamation was worth doing and could be successful. Officials also reviewed the environmental issues, including potential effects to threatened and endangered species, related to establishing the easement.” Many of the affected acres had been previously enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) because of their marginal cropland characteristics and vulnerability to flooding. Under the WREP perpetual easement agreement, no fences or water developments can be established on the enrolled acres. If necessary, enrolled acres are mowed to help manage weeds. Landowners can also realize benefit through the use of periodic haying to facilitate improved grass vigor and production. This use, however, requires additional permitting with the development of a Compatible Use Plan. Seeding was completed in Spring 2013. In the 2014 growing season, seeded vegetation had plenty of weed competition. However, by Spring 2015, Big Bluestem, switch grass, and Indian grass suppressed weeds. Prairie coneflower, gray goldenrod and other blooming perennials drew butterflies, bees and other wildlife to the area. “It took time for the seeded plants to become established,” Loof says. “But now, barring any further flooding, the land should be self-sustaining.” What are the chances the area will flood again. “About 99.9%,” Corio says. “It may not be as bad as 2011, but it’s pretty certain it will flood again.” If that happens, the easement acres will help absorb floodwaters and reduce damage to surrounding crop acres. If restoration or reclamation is required again, NRCS will take on that responsibility. “Well established vegetation will help buffer the area from flood damage and erosion if it floods again,” Loof says. “In the meantime, it provides important wildlife habitat and preservation of an area that’s invaluable to the general public and the residents of Union County.” - # - |
Date | |
Source | NRCS HELPS UNION COUNTY, SD FARMER RECLAIM LAND |
Author | USDA NRCS South Dakota |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by USDA NRCS South Dakota at https://flickr.com/photos/68847506@N08/21864070826 (archive). It was reviewed on 27 January 2018 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
27 January 2018
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This image is a work of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, part of the United States Department of Agriculture, taken or made as part of an employee's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain in the United States. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 13:23, 27 January 2018 | 2,848 × 4,272 (5.07 MB) | Artix Kreiger 2 (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2Commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS REBEL T3 |
Exposure time | 1/125 sec (0.008) |
F-number | f/7.1 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 18:51, 25 February 2012 |
Lens focal length | 25 mm |
Orientation | Rotated 90° CCW |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
File change date and time | 18:51, 25 February 2012 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 18:51, 25 February 2012 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 7 |
APEX aperture | 5.625 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 18 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 18 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 18 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 4,720.4419889503 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 4,786.5546218487 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |