File:LR 9.2.2022-Leserbrief-Streit um Weltkriegs-Denkmal.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 446 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 179 × 240 pixels | 357 × 480 pixels | 875 × 1,175 pixels.
Original file (875 × 1,175 pixels, file size: 259 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionLR 9.2.2022-Leserbrief-Streit um Weltkriegs-Denkmal.jpg |
Deutsch: Leserbrief in der Lausitzer Rundschau vom 9.2.2022 veröffentlicht (Lokalteil Senftenberg und Seenland) Leserposition zu geplantem Gefallenen-Denkmal mit Hinweis auf die Petition "Neues Weltkriegsdenkmal in Ruhland ? Bitte ohne Balkenkreuz und Adler !" |
Date | |
Source | Own work for the text |
Author | Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR |
Hier steht nur der Text veröffentlicht, dazu war in der Zeitung ein Bild von Steffen Rasche
Licensing
[edit]I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:06, 13 March 2023 | 875 × 1,175 (259 KB) | Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 2 pages use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | Wilhelm Zimmerling |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 16:55, 13 March 2023 |
Date and time of digitizing | 16:55, 13 March 2023 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 53 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 53 |