File:ISN 199 -- Abdul Rahman Ma Ath Thafir Al Amri -- Guantanamo weights.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ISN_199_--_Abdul_Rahman_Ma_Ath_Thafir_Al_Amri_--_Guantanamo_weights.jpg (681 × 553 pixels, file size: 65 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionISN 199 -- Abdul Rahman Ma Ath Thafir Al Amri -- Guantanamo weights.jpg |
English: w:Guantanamo captive w:Abdul_Rahman_Ma_Ath_Thafir_Al_Amri weight was recorded 71 times between February 9th, 2002 and April 24, 2006. At 66.5 inches the healthy range for his weight was between 116 and 156 pounds. At its lowest his weight dipped to 90 pounds. |
Date | |
Source | Own work by uploader from a table in this file |
Author | Geo Swan |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 08:58, 8 January 2009 | 681 × 553 (65 KB) | Geo Swan (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description={{en|1=w:Guantanamo captive w:Abdul_Rahman_Ma_Ath_Thafir_Al_Amri weight was recorded 71 times between February 9th, 2002 and April 24, 2006. At 66.5 inches the healthy range for his weight was between 116 and 156 pounds. |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
_error | 0 |
---|
Hidden categories: