File:FatimaGSK1891.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 453 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 181 pixels | 640 × 362 pixels | 1,024 × 580 pixels | 1,429 × 809 pixels.
Original file (1,429 × 809 pixels, file size: 451 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionFatimaGSK1891.jpg |
English: fatima, ♀, from "Rhopalocera Exotica". |
Date | |
Source | Rhopalocera Exotica, 1891. |
Author | Henley Grose-Smith and William Forsell Kirby |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.
Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings.PD-1923Public domain in the United States//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FatimaGSK1891.jpg |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 19:29, 15 December 2016 | 1,429 × 809 (451 KB) | Accassidy (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on ceb.wikipedia.org
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on nl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on species.wikimedia.org
- Usage on sv.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | Alan |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 19:21, 15 December 2016 |
Width | 1,757 px |
Height | 1,151 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 192 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 192 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows |
File change date and time | 19:25, 15 December 2016 |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 19:21, 15 December 2016 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 77 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 77 |
Color space | sRGB |
Date metadata was last modified | 19:25, 15 December 2016 |
Unique ID of original document | FB538602CA62422195DEF6E012089F1E |
IIM version | 50,405 |
Hidden category: