File:Early Medieval Probable Bracelet Fragment (Viking) (FindID 394236).jpg
Original file (1,525 × 1,383 pixels, file size: 638 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Early Medieval Probable Bracelet Fragment (Viking) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Photographer |
Derby Museums Trust, Charlotte Burrill, 2011-12-20 16:01:29 |
||
Title |
Early Medieval Probable Bracelet Fragment (Viking) |
||
Description |
English: Surface metal analysis conducted at the British Museum indicated an approximate silver content for the ring of 95%, the remainder being copper with traces of gold and lead; it weighs 2.62 grams.
The find consists of a thin strip of silver which has been sharply folded approximately in half and has one slightly constricted, rounded end, while the other end is square and may be original, or has perhaps been cut short; length, 28 mm (extant), or 53 mm (surviving); width, 9 mm. The strip is decorated with four horizontal rows of punched triangles, which point apex to apex along one side, appear more circular at the rounded end and have been much worn away, except at this end and along the edges. There appears to be a lightly incised median line on the less worn side. There are two testing nicks in the folded end and the ring may have been folded up for use as bullion or for recasting. An unconnected fragment of iron is gripped between the two halves of the strip. Viking rings of similar strip form and style of decoration are recorded from a number of sites in Scandinavia, e.g. on Gotland, Sweden (M. Stenberger, Die Schatzfunde Gotlands der Wikingerzeit, vol. 2, KVHAA, Lund 1947, figs. 38: 6, 87, and 109: 2). A complete, punch-decorated silver finger-ring, but with a broader band and knotted ends, has previously been reported as Treasure from Great Finborough, Suffolk (Treasure Annual Report 2002, no. 52) and the testing nicks on the present piece further confirm a date in the Viking period, around the 9th-10th century. The ring from the Shaftesbury area would therefore qualify as Treasure under two of the stipulated criteria of the Treasure Act: it is more than 300 years old and the precious metal content exceeds 10%. Note: I am grateful to Prof. J. Graham-Campbell for assistance with the identification of the ring. B.M. Ager |
||
Depicted place | (County of findspot) Dorset | ||
Date | EARLY MEDIEVAL | ||
Accession number |
FindID: 394236 Old ref: DENO-9F9344 Filename: 2010_T385a.JPG |
||
Credit line |
|
||
Source |
https://finds.org.uk/database/ajax/download/id/361303 Catalog: https://finds.org.uk/database/images/image/id/361303/recordtype/artefacts archive copy at the Wayback Machine Artefact: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/394236 |
||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Attribution-ShareAlike License |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:00, 3 February 2017 | 1,525 × 1,383 (638 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | Portable Antiquities Scheme, DENO, FindID: 394236, early medieval, page 6833, batch primary count 43393 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on et.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON |
---|---|
Camera model | E990 |
Exposure time | 10/1,383 sec (0.0072306579898771) |
F-number | f/5.6 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | Unknown date |
Lens focal length | 19 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows |
File change date and time | 15:44, 20 December 2011 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.1 |
Date and time of digitizing | Unknown date |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 2 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.5 APEX (f/3.36) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Image width | 1,525 px |
Image height | 1,383 px |
Date metadata was last modified | 15:44, 20 December 2011 |
Copyright status | Copyright status not set |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:6257FD81FC2AE111B3EDB262203B916F |