File:DUR-84F652 (FindID 410861).jpg
Original file (1,200 × 1,384 pixels, file size: 518 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DUR-84F652 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Photographer |
Durham County Council, Frances McIntosh, 2010-10-15 13:56:29 |
||
Title |
DUR-84F652 |
||
Description |
English: Heavy gold signet ring, finely engraved with a coat of arms, oriented vertically, within a dotted border.
Images of the signet ring were examined by Dr Clive Cheesman, College of Arms, who has provided the following information: 'The ring shows the coat of arms of a family called Prestwich. The coat of arms consists of a shield and, displayed on top of a helmet, a crest. The shield is quartered, the first and fourth quarters showing a design consisting of a mermaid, reputedly granted in the mid-16th century to a family called Prestwich of Hulme, Manchester. We do not unfortunately have a precise date for this grant, which is not on official record. The second and third quarters show a more complex design consisting of a chevron with lions' faces on it and a lion between two fleurs-de-lys in the upper segment. This design was the original coat of arms of the family, predating the mermaid design, and there is other evidence to show that the family subsequently 'quartered' the old and the new designs together in this fashion. The crest is a porcupine. In 1644 Thomas Prestwich, the head of the family was made a baronet, a title which died out with his son in 1676; but the nature of the helmet on this seal and the lack of a baronet's badge indicate that this seal was not made for a baronet. It may therefore have been made for the head of the family before 1644, or for a younger son. It is not clear to me that the first baronet had any younger sons, however; in terms both of its impressive size and of the style of its heraldic engraving I feel this object is consistent with being made for the head of the family before 1644. This may be Thomas Prestwich or his father Edmund Prestwich of Hulme (died 1629, buried in Manchester Collegiate Church - now the cathedral) - or an earlier generation. There is evidence of the mermaid design in use from 1567 at the latest, though this seal still seems to be an early instance (possibly the earliest) of its use as a quartering together with the other design.' |
||
Depicted place | (County of findspot) North Yorkshire | ||
Date |
between 1500 and 1700 date QS:P571,+1500-00-00T00:00:00Z/6,P1319,+1500-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1326,+1700-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 |
||
Accession number |
FindID: 410861 Old ref: DUR-84F652 Filename: DUR-84F652.jpg |
||
Credit line |
|
||
Source |
https://finds.org.uk/database/ajax/download/id/300535 Catalog: https://finds.org.uk/database/images/image/id/300535/recordtype/artefacts archive copy at the Wayback Machine Artefact: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/410861 |
||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Attribution-ShareAlike License version 4.0 (verified 14 November 2020) |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 14:23, 28 January 2017 | 1,200 × 1,384 (518 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | Portable Antiquities Scheme, DUR, FindID: 410861, post medieval, page 1329, batch count 15783 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on fr.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot G10 |
Exposure time | 1/30 sec (0.033333333333333) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 200 |
Date and time of data generation | 11:16, 13 October 2010 |
Lens focal length | 18.098 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop 7.0 |
File change date and time | 13:34, 13 October 2010 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 11:16, 13 October 2010 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 4.90625 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0.66666666666667 |
Maximum land aperture | 4 APEX (f/4) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 15,123.287671233 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 15,123.287671233 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Standard |
IIM version | 2 |