File:Architect and engineer (1935) (14781779482).jpg

Identifier: architectenginee12135sanf (find matches)
Title: Architect and engineer
Year: 1905 (1900s)
Authors:
Subjects: Architecture Architecture Architecture Building
Publisher: San Francisco : Architect and Engineer, Inc
Contributing Library: San Francisco Public Library
Digitizing Sponsor: San Francisco Public Library

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
th twin structure. A - Southerly branch of East Shore Highway. B—Central branch approach. C—Northerly branch of East Shore Highway. M—Mole or main line approach.AN—Travel from A line to north structure. SA—Travel from south structure to A line. SB—Travel The guide in this phase of the problemwas a detailed origin and destination traffic-survey, made under the supervision ofLester S. Ready, consulting engineer, bythe California Railroad Commission techni-cal staff, and generally outlined in theHoover-Young report of August, 1930. 2. So locating the approach arterials that they would ultimately become portions ofState highway through routes. A guide in this phase of the problem wasthe public demand for an East Shore in-dustrial highway extending between SanJose and Richmond, comparable to theBayshore Highway now nearing comple-tion between San Jose and San Francisco THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER ^ 46 ► APRIL. NINETEEN THIRTY-FIVE Approaches of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
Text Appearing After Image:
from south structure to I, line. BN—Travel from B line to north structure. NC—Travel from northstructure to C line. CS—Travel from C line to south structure. NM—Travel from north structure tomole approach. MS—Travel from mole approach to south structure. CM—Travel from C line to moleapproach. MC —Travel from mole approach to C line. on the west side of the bay. There wasalso public demand for the westerly ex-Ntension of State highway Route 5 throughOakland, in the general vicinity of MossAvenue, which had become a commonlyused route of travel—not because it wasoriginally planned as such, nor because itwas suited for heavy travel, but because of the lack of any traflfic artery through thissection of Oakland. After comprehensive economic studieshad been made, the official approach systemadopted in the East Bay area was the ex-tension easterly as far as 38th and MarketStreets of the east and west main bridge ap-proach as a part of State highway Route 5, THE ARCHITECT AND

Note About Images