File:Ancient legends of Roman history (1905) (14776974052).jpg

Identifier: ancientlegendsof00pais (find matches)
Title: Ancient legends of Roman history
Year: 1905 (1900s)
Authors: Pais, Ettore, 1856-1939 Cosenza, Mario Emilio, 1880-1966, tr
Subjects:
Publisher: New York, Dodd, Mead & Company
Contributing Library: The Library of Congress
Digitizing Sponsor: The Library of Congress

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
but which (to state my opinionfrankly) gives me the impression of being still more recent. The persistency of such archaic characters among thepeoples of the Peninsula cannot be explained by the isola-tion in which they lived. For, even laying aside many otherconsiderations, it is well known that the coast of Venetiawas visited by the Corcyraei and Tarentini as early as thefifth century, and was finally settled by the Syracusans.Likewise, the civilization of the Sabine races during thefourth century is explicitly testified to by the ancients. Thepersistency of forms which in Greece tend to disappear inthe latter half of the fifth century is especially due to thefact that the Italic races retained for a long time the orig- 24 ANCIENT LEGENDS OF ROMAN HISTORY inal forms,—forms which they employed at the time whenthey directly or indirectly learned the art of writing fromthe Greeks. The Veneti, as we learn from a bilingual in-scription, continued to write with archaic letters and from
Text Appearing After Image:
right to left after they had learned to write Latin inscrip-tions, with letters of more recent form, and in the directionfrom left to right. For this same reason, the Oscans andEtruscans continued the use of archaic characters and thedirection from right to left as late as the third century. If,then, among these and other races of Italy there came, later, atime when they perfected and elaborated their graphic char-acters, such elaboration is not to be attributed to the suc-cessive modifications of the Hellenic alphabets, but ratherto a local evolution of characters learned ab antico fromthe Greeks. In short, the comparison with the Greek inscriptions onthe one hand, and with the Italic dialectic inscriptions on theother, does not present a single fact which compels us tobelieve that the Roman stele belongs to the sixth centuryB.C., or to an even more remote age. It obliges us, rather,to consider whether, perchance, it be not later than the

Note About Images