File:Anatomical Venus. Wax figure of reclining woman, Florence. Wellcome L0058207.jpg
Original file (4,256 × 2,832 pixels, file size: 821 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Anatomical Venus. Wax figure of reclining woman, Florence. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Title |
Anatomical Venus. Wax figure of reclining woman, Florence. |
||
Description |
What is odd about this model? It could be described in many ways - beautiful, exposed, sexually alluring. Is that consistent with its role as an anatomical teaching model? Should it have these qualities, or other more scientific ones? Wax anatomical models of this period had different uses for different audiences. In the European anatomical tradition, the standard or normative body was always male. Female bodies were studied in terms of how they differed. In practice this meant a focus on their reproductive capacities - most often they were pregnant, with a foetus as one of the removable pieces. But does this explain the model's passive, sexualised pose? Female wax anatomical models were often referred to as "Venuses", after the goddess of love and beauty. Reclining on silk or velvet cushions, in positions copied from works of art, they often had flowing hair and jewellery, which added nothing to their anatomical use. They served to show not just physical differences but also gender differences, as perceived in European culture at that time. A third way of understanding the model is to see the exposed body layers as a symbol of nature "unveiling herself" to the medical gaze. Looking deep into the body was considered to be the route to knowledge. In just one model, ideas about art, anatomy, gender, flesh and knowledge were all conveyed. So it is not surprising if you have mixed reactions to the model - it was made that way. maker: Susini, Clemente Place made: Florence, Firenze, Tuscany, Italy Public Programmes |
||
Credit line |
|
||
References |
|
||
Source/Photographer |
https://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/obf_images/e5/c3/3ff11f05f3a72fde47fe59fb9b84.jpg |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 12:37, 17 October 2014 | 4,256 × 2,832 (821 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Artwork |artist = |author = |title = Anatomical Venus. Wax figure of reclining woman, Florence. |description = What is odd about this model? It could be described in many ways –... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on fr.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ja.wikipedia.org
- Usage on nn.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | L0058207 Wax anatomical figure of reclining woman, Florence, Ita |
---|---|
Author | Wellcome Library, London |
Headline | L0058207 Wax anatomical figure of reclining woman, Florence, Italy, 1 |
Copyright holder | Copyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only licence CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Image title | L0058207 Wax anatomical figure of reclining woman, Florence, Italy, 1
Credit: Science Museum, London. Wellcome Images images@wellcome.ac.uk http://wellcomeimages.org What is odd about this model? It could be described in many ways – beautiful, exposed, sexually alluring. Is that consistent with its role as an anatomical teaching model? Should it have these qualities, or other more scientific ones? Wax anatomical models of this period had different uses for different audiences. In the European anatomical tradition, the standard or normative body was always male. Female bodies were studied in terms of how they differed. In practice this meant a focus on their reproductive capacities – most often they were pregnant, with a foetus as one of the removable pieces. But does this explain the model’s passive, sexualised pose? Female wax anatomical models were often referred to as ‘Venuses’, after the goddess of love and beauty. Reclining on silk or velvet cushions, in positions copied from works of art, they often had flowing hair and jewellery, which added nothing to their anatomical use. They served to show not just physical differences but also gender differences, as perceived in European culture at that time. A third way of understanding the model is to see the exposed body layers as a symbol of nature ‘unveiling herself’ to the medical gaze. Looking deep into the body was considered to be the route to knowledge. In just one model, ideas about art, anatomy, gender, flesh and knowledge were all conveyed. So it is not surprising if you have mixed reactions to the model – it was made that way. maker: Susini, Clemente Place made: Florence, Firenze, Tuscany, Italy made: 1771-1800 Published: - Copyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only licence CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
IIM version | 2 |