File:Adult Male Habronattus cognatus 2.jpg
Original file (1,280 × 854 pixels, file size: 797 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionAdult Male Habronattus cognatus 2.jpg |
Here's an old shot from last last May that I originally turned down in favor for this shot. I realize this type of shot may not be a big hit, but in retrospect, I prefer this composition despite the decreased magnification and hidden chelicerae. Here's the original text that accompanied the last post: Several weeks ago, I photographed an interesting looking female Habronattus at a spot near the Canadian River I visit frequently to look for tiger beetles. She looked quite different than the usual female H. coecatus specimens I can find relatively easily around Oklahoma, so I've been having high hopes I finding a new Habronattus male species every time I head out to the spot. So, my persistence payed off, and after a rather unsuccessful afternoon of stalking the larger tiger beetles near the river, I spotted this little guy (~4mm) as he was watching a large caterpillar wiggle its way across the sandy path. I was exhausted and didn't feel like chasing him around in the sand, so I let him hop in a jar I had with me and took him on home. Although not as flashy as some of the Habronattus species in the U.S., this little male H. cognatus is handsome in his own right - I love those intermittent, mottled scales on his chelicerae. He wasn't in the best cosmetic shape (missing scales/worn) but proved to be quite a lively and active spider that would only slow down when partially covered by the leaves I collected and set out to photograph him on. During the next bug-hunt, I released him at the excact same spot where I found him. If you are interested in the Habronattus genus (you really should be) make sure to take a look at tolweb's entry here: tolweb.org/Habronattus |
Date | |
Source | Adult Male Habronattus cognatus Jumping spider |
Author | Thomas Shahan from USA |
Camera location | 35° 12′ 29.02″ N, 97° 30′ 06.11″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 35.208060; -97.501698 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on December 22, 2010 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:17, 9 February 2011 | 1,280 × 854 (797 KB) | Quibik (talk | contribs) | Removed the watermark. | |
21:00, 22 December 2010 | 1,280 × 854 (808 KB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description=[http://www.flickr.com/photos/opoterser/5275801576/sizes/o/in/photostream/ '''''Click here for a larger view!'' '''] I apologize for the lack of posts lately - I've been quite busy. Rest assured, big news (don't get your hopes |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 2 pages use this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on ceb.wikipedia.org
- Usage on id.wikipedia.org
- Usage on it.wikipedia.org
- Usage on nl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on sv.wikipedia.org
- Usage on vi.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | PENTAX Corporation |
---|---|
Camera model | PENTAX K200D |
Exposure time | 1/125 sec (0.008) |
F-number | f/0 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:08, 5 May 2010 |
Lens focal length | 100 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | GIMP 2.6.10 |
File change date and time | 19:16, 9 February 2011 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Manual |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:08, 5 May 2010 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 150 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject distance range | Unknown |