File:20th Anniversary- Oklahoma City Bombing-150419.jpg
Original file (5,000 × 3,272 pixels, file size: 2.09 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description20th Anniversary- Oklahoma City Bombing-150419.jpg |
English: Click here to learn more about the Tulsa District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
20 years later: Tulsa District engineers recall Oklahoma City Bombing, response Story By Brannen Parrish, USACE Tulsa Photo Courtesy Mark Burkholder, USACE Tulsa Following the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995, the Tulsa District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dispatched three structural engineers to monitor the site. Mark McVay and two other civil engineers arrived the next day. The District sent a fourth structural engineer, Mark Burkholder, a couple of weeks later, to monitor the site so demolitions experts could implode the remaining structure. The bomb that destroyed the building detonated just 15 feet from the building and caused the deaths of 168 people. “After the blast, a lot of Good Samaritans rushed in to help,” said Mark McVay. “One of the people who responded was a nurse. She just arrived at the site and was trying to help victims when a piece of debris fell and hit her on the head.” The nurse, Rebecca Anderson, went to the site after seeing news reports on television. She died in the hospital four days later. Though rescue workers sustained numerous injuries searching for and assisting survivors, she was the only one killed. “The roof of the Murrah Building was made from a mixture of light concrete and insulation, and it just crumbled in the explosion,” McVay said. “There were large chunks of debris hanging from the skeleton of the building that could crush a car if they fell.” The civil engineers used a transit, a surveying tool used to measure angles, and a telescope to watch for falling debris. They also advised rescue workers as they attempted to remove rubble during the search for survivors. “We would go into an area and assess the structure and tell them, whether they could move a piece without endangering a survivor,” said McVay. “There were a lot of long days. I remember being exhausted.” Burkholder was sent in as the building was being prepped it for demolition. “The demolition experts were drilling holes to weaken the remaining structure and to place the charges,” Burkholder said. “They were concerned that as they weakened it, a slab might fall down. There are critical spots on the building that you don’t want to move and we checked them regularly.” The engineers set up their transit under an American elm tree in what used to be a parking lot between the Murrah Building and the Journal Record Building. The explosion sent glass and shrapnel into the tree’s trunk and branches, and even destroyed some of the branches. Though the explosion ripped away a portion of the Journal Record Building’s roof, the elm remained. “At that time it was just a tree,” said Burkholder. “But a lot of people in casual conversation were asking, ‘How did that tree survive?’” The Survivor Tree has thrived in the years following the bombing. Though it represented a curious improbability at the time, today it is a symbol of a community’s resilience. “You have to realize that businesses in the area were so damaged they just closed down. I had to go five blocks to buy a sandwich and the sandwich shop that was open had damage. I thought the entire area around the site would be demolished,” said McVay. “I never realized that tree would become a symbol for the survivors or the city, even though we were all commenting, ‘that’s one tough tree.’” McVay and Burkholder both agreed that they were most affected by the destruction of the daycare located on the second floor of the building, and just above the blast zone. “It was the saddest thing I’d ever seen in my life,” said McVay. “It hit you in the gut when you see little kids’ toys scattered amongst the debris.” Burkholder said he visited the site 10 years ago on a field trip with one of his children. “When I first went back it kind of weighed on my mind,” he said. “It was tough. I can’t imagine the people who were doing the search and rescue operations.” McVay said he is considering whether he will visit on the 20th anniversary. “No, I haven’t been back. I can’t say that I haven’t had the chance, I just haven’t gone back,” he said. “I’d like to go sometime. I hadn’t planned on going on the anniversary but now that you mention it.” The other structural engineers from the Tulsa District have moved on to other assignments. Lori Thomas now works at the Galveston District and John VanLeeuwen now works for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Click here to learn more about the Tulsa District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
Date | |
Source | https://www.flickr.com/photos/usacetulsa/17071631109/ |
Author | usacetulsa |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by usacetulsa at https://flickr.com/photos/37353087@N03/17071631109. It was reviewed on 30 December 2021 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
30 December 2021
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:39, 30 December 2021 | 5,000 × 3,272 (2.09 MB) | Xnatedawgx (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by usacetulsa from https://www.flickr.com/photos/usacetulsa/17071631109/ with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS 7D Mark II |
Exposure time | 1/125 sec (0.008) |
F-number | f/5.6 |
ISO speed rating | 2,000 |
Date and time of data generation | 09:02, 20 April 2015 |
Lens focal length | 59 mm |
Width | 5,472 px |
Height | 3,648 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) |
File change date and time | 14:25, 24 April 2015 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Aperture priority |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 09:02, 20 April 2015 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 7 |
APEX aperture | 5 |
APEX exposure bias | 0.33333333333333 |
Maximum land aperture | 4.625 APEX (f/4.97) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 93 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 93 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 93 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 6,086.7630700779 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 6,090.1502504174 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Serial number of camera | 022021007169 |
Lens used | EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |
Date metadata was last modified | 09:25, 24 April 2015 |
Unique ID of original document | 85BBBDDC2DDE342C1ED9A9711618EE29 |