File:14th-century mirror case, exterior (FindID 99807).jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 320 × 598 pixels. Other resolution: 528 × 987 pixels.
Original file (528 × 987 pixels, file size: 36 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]14th-century mirror case, exterior | |||
---|---|---|---|
Photographer |
Northamptonshire County Council, Robert Webley, 2005-06-24 10:21:39 |
||
Title |
14th-century mirror case, exterior |
||
Description |
English: A cast copper-alloy medieval mirror case consisting of two slightly convex discs. Each disc has a single lug on one side and a pair on the opposite side. No glass remains on the recessed inside surfaces of the discs, although the internal residue could be of calcium carbonate, a cement used to hold the glass in place. External decoration consists of the outline of a crude, rounded, open cross, in double lines of opposed triangles on one disc and single lines on the other disc. Further, on both discs there is a pair of straight(ish) lines running diametrically between the lugs from side to side. Such decoration was probably made using a roulette (Geake 2001, 72). Examples of mirror cases decorated in such a way are illustrated in Egan and Pritchard (1991, 361-362; refs. 1714-1716). These date from the period c. 1270 - c. 1350. Other publications (e.g. Mills 1999, 103) give a 14th-century date for mirror cases decorated in this way. That this was a standard decoration for contemporary mirror cases is noted in the literature and is also evidenced by parallels which can be found on the Portable Antiquities Scheme database. It is unclear whether these two discs both formed part of the same mirror case. As stated, the decoration varies on each disc regarding the number of lines used to form the triangles. The patina on each disc differs as does the level of wear, particular in terms of the bent profile of one of the discs. Finally, it seems that neither double lug is pierced on the discs while both single lugs appear to have been pierced and subsequently abraded such that they are no longer complete. Inevitably, therefore, the rivet from the side which would have hinged has been lost. |
||
Depicted place | (County of findspot) Northamptonshire | ||
Date |
between 1300 and 1350 date QS:P571,+1350-00-00T00:00:00Z/7,P1319,+1300-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1326,+1350-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 |
||
Accession number |
FindID: 99807 Old ref: NARC-AE3C17 Filename: NARC-AE3C17mirrorobv.jpg |
||
Credit line |
|
||
Source |
https://finds.org.uk/database/ajax/download/id/67595 Catalog: https://finds.org.uk/database/images/image/id/67595/recordtype/artefacts archive copy at the Wayback Machine Artefact: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/99807 |
||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Attribution-ShareAlike License | ||
Other versions |
|
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.
Attribution: The Portable Antiquities Scheme/ The Trustees of the British Museum
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:27, 3 February 2017 | 528 × 987 (36 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | Portable Antiquities Scheme, HAMP, FindID: 99807, medieval, page 3267, batch direction-asc count 38876 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 3 pages use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
JPEG file comment | LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 |
---|