File:012092021 3rd century BCE Saru Maru Panguraria Buddhist site, Madhya Pradesh 201.jpg
Original file (1,280 × 960 pixels, file size: 1.94 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description012092021 3rd century BCE Saru Maru Panguraria Buddhist site, Madhya Pradesh 201.jpg |
English: Saru Maru Buddhist monastic complex – often referred to as the Panguraria or Pangudariyam archaeological site in scholarly literature – is an Ashoka-related 3rd-century BCE site about 25 kilometers west of Narmadapuram in Madhya Pradesh. It is notable for Brahmi inscriptions about Ashoka's life as a prince, and later one of his minor Dharma edicts as the Mauryan emperor. The Saru Maru site offers rare insights into his pre-Buddhist life and the ancient Hindu culture (c. 3rd-century BCE), as well as one of the roots of Sinhalese Buddhism as both Mahinda and Sanghamitta were born to prince Ashoka and Devi when they lived in this region. The site is also important in archaeological study of Buddhism as it has thirty three stupas spread over nearby hills. It was a significant Buddhist monastic site from Ashoka's time till about the 13th-century CE.
Panguraria (Saru Maru, Saro Maro) is located on the southern side of the Vindhya mountains, midst forests and scenic valleys, north of the Narmada river. The site was discovered accidentally in the 1970s by Indian archaeologists. The Panguraria inscriptions survive in a damaged form, were edited and published in 1976 (see DC Sircar (1979), Ashokan Studies, pp. 94–103). The most interesting inscription is inside a rock shelter, in Brahmi script, and it says that Ashoka "now called Piyadasi, once came to this place for a pleasure tour as prince with his consort" (Devi, his future wife, mother of his two children). Other evidence confirms that Devi was the daughter of an Ujjain merchant and banker, so she and prince Ashoka (pre-Buddhist) came to vacation here together from Ujjain, years before their marriage (for other details, see Harry Falk (1997), The Preamble at Panguraria, Indica et Tibetica, pp. 107–121). The minor Rock edict No 1 inscription is near the prince Ashoka inscription, but more formal and elegantly completed. Both are in the early Brahmi script. The minor edict is damaged too. It is important and interesting because it is the fifteenth version of the same edict found in pre-2nd century BCE Greater India. It has several important language and content differences from 14 versions discovered before the 1970s, so the Saru Maru inscription is helpful in understanding the development of languages and the written script in Ancient India. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Ms Sarah Welch |
Other versions | Panguraria Top View Closeup detail.jpg: |
Camera location | 22° 43′ 27.92″ N, 77° 31′ 51.42″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 22.724422; 77.530950 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. | |
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.enCC0Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedicationfalsefalse |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:27, 15 February 2023 | 1,280 × 960 (1.94 MB) | Ms Sarah Welch (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
---|---|
Camera model | SM-M317F |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/1.8 |
ISO speed rating | 50 |
Date and time of data generation | 14:49, 9 December 2021 |
Lens focal length | 5.23 mm |
Latitude | 22° 43′ 27.92″ N |
Longitude | 77° 31′ 51.42″ E |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | Luminar AI |
File change date and time | 14:49, 9 December 2021 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 14:49, 9 December 2021 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX aperture | 1.69 |
APEX brightness | 8.97 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 1.69 APEX (f/1.8) |
Metering mode | Spot |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 000 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 4 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 24 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |