File:-1926- Pale Brindled Beauty (Phigalia pilosaria) (50908615318).jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 545 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 218 × 240 pixels | 437 × 480 pixels | 699 × 768 pixels | 932 × 1,024 pixels | 2,289 × 2,516 pixels.
Original file (2,289 × 2,516 pixels, file size: 4.02 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description-1926- Pale Brindled Beauty (Phigalia pilosaria) (50908615318).jpg | Bishop's Stortford - Work - East Hertfordshire |
Date | |
Source | [1926] Pale Brindled Beauty (Phigalia pilosaria) |
Author | Ben Sale from Stevenage, UK |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Bennyboymothman at https://flickr.com/photos/33398884@N03/50908615318. It was reviewed on 18 August 2023 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
18 August 2023
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 14:36, 18 August 2023 | 2,289 × 2,516 (4.02 MB) | Rudolphous (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera model | SM-G920F |
---|---|
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
F-number | f/1.9 |
Lens focal length | 4.3 mm |
Date and time of data generation | 12:55, 3 February 2021 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
File change date and time | 20:13, 4 February 2021 |
Width | 5,312 px |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Height | 2,988 px |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Orientation | 0 |
Software used | G920FXXS6ETI6 |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Color space | sRGB |
Date and time of digitizing | 12:55, 3 February 2021 |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
APEX aperture | 1.85 |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Unique image ID | A16LSIA00VM A16LSJL02SM |
APEX shutter speed | 6.64 |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 28 mm |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 1.85 APEX (f/1.9) |
Scene capture type | Standard |
APEX brightness | 3.81 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |