Commons:Valued image candidates/Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Taxidermy of a snake skin.jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by Lucas.Belo (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC) on 2017-03-02 21:04 (UTC)[reply]
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eunectes murinus (anaconda) skin. after technique of taxidermy.
Used in

Global usage

Snakeskin (en), Serpente (pt), Serpentes (es)
Review
(criteria)

Previous reviews

Try QI; Without the possibility of recognizing the species it has no value.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Archaeodontosaurus: , thank you for the note regarding the species. I made contact again with the museum and was confirmed the species of the image, the director of the museum said that it is possible to identify the species by observing the pattern of the scales. -- Lucas.Belo (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this approach. If it can not be a picture of value it is in any case a beautiful image quality. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you read Lucas.Belo's response correctly: "the director of the museum said that it is possible to identify the species by observing the pattern of the scales." In other words, the picture can be of value. So are you going to vote for it now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I had misunderstood. One can easily identify a species by seeing only its skin; But on condition of being able to see it, this is not the case here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. You can't see the skin in the picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One does not see the skin that is enrolled is like trying to read a book without opening it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. The scales are clearly visible, aren't they? Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]