Commons:Valued image candidates/Phasianella modesta modesta 01.JPG

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Llez (talk) on 2015-11-25 17:51 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Phasianella modesta ssp. modesta, Shell
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment @Llez: Should link to category. Is this a different species to Phasianella solida? - the Wikipedia article says they are synonyms. Charles (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment I share the same concern that Charles --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment Yes, Wikimedia says, but it relies only on one source, [1]. [2], on which I refer to (see also description page), accepts it as valid species, also [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. It's a pity, that Wikipedia (as often in shells) refers only to one source (WoRMS) and not considers other opinions. --Llez (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Support It certainly looks different. Perhaps best to cross reference. Charles (talk) 11:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Done References in description page --Llez (talk) 15:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu