Commons:Valued image candidates/Erechteum south-west view in 2017 (1).jpg

Erechteum south-west view in 2017 (1).jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	--Peulle (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC) on 2017-10-15 22:11 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: The Erechtheum seen from the south-west.
Used in	Global usage 4 Wikipedia articles
Reason	Best in scope, IMHO. -- --Peulle (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Review (criteria)	Question What is the correct process when the scope is only slightly different. As this is very good. To be clear I'm just looking for clarification as this has the scope of the whole Erchtheum. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment You're right, that FP is very good. It has a slightly different angle to mine, but I still see it as close enough to being the same scope. The correct process is for you to evaluate which one of the photos (from this angle) you think is the best when looking at them at the review size (e.g. 480x360 pixels for a standard 4:3 landscape image). If you think the old one is better, I have no problem with that.--Peulle (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)  Support I'm going to support this for two reasons. One I like it and feel it meets the criteria, and two because I think COM:VIS Concurrent and overlapping scopes, I feel does not address this. I don't see why this can't be approved and I think that's crazy. If anyone feels I'm wrong i'd love to know why. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)  Oppose - I think the FP is better in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)  Oppose I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => declined. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)