The image looks very artificial, nearly like painted. If we chose this object, I'd prefer File:Broadway-tower-cotswolds-modf.jpg, which looks more real, and shows the landscape in which and for which the object was built.
The tower was used to carry a beacon, and it was used as workshop and dwelling. So it isn't a folly in the pure sense.
en:Broadway Tower is a tiny castle, built just to see if a beacon from that hill could be seen from a rich lady's house or not. If that's not a folly, I don't know what is.
As to the image's artificiality, are you saying it's over composed? I guess I can't really argue with that. The image you propose is indeed perhaps more suitable, as it gives a better sense of scale. --Matthew Proctor (talk) 02:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had a too narrow definition of folly in mind. Thought of facades without rooms or accessible storeys behind them. But I see that I was wrong. Keep up oppose for the second reason. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
