Commons:Valued image candidates/Île d'Aix.- Hôtel de ville ( Piso17).jpg

Île d'Aix.- Hôtel de ville ( Piso17).jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Pierre André (talk) on 2021-05-21 21:47 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Hôtel de ville de l’Île-d'Aix, France
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Best in Scope, but maybe the direction of view is not needed in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment OK, I cross out the mention of the direction. --Pierre André (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)  Oppose Be careful you have without wanting a theft. You can not in any way put your name on the image of the other author, especially in the present case. I asked for erasure. You can change the image has been planned but not appropriate. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment Ok, I didn't know how to present this file due to the modifications I made. I have restored the name of its author. Best regards,--Pierre André (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)  Question What needs to be done? This is a photo by Patrick Despoix, edited by Pierre André. Isn't that OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Only 405 - Hôtel de ville - Ile d'Aix.jpg is legitimate. The one that is proposed can be seen as an attempted hijacking. It is proposed for erasure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC) I don't understand. Aren't people allowed to edit other users' photos as long as they give the original photographer credit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment No problem of substance but a big problem of form. Even if he corrected the grossest error, the picture is the same. The only legal image is 405 - Hôtel de ville - Ile d'Aix.jpg which should be promoted by VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment So you think his perspective-corrected version should be saved with the same filename as a deceased man's photo? Why can't it be saved under another name and described as an edited version? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment It is the rule. Look in the contest this image where the perspective has been corrected Exterior view of Nabadwip Mahanirban Math.jpg the modification only appears in the caption at the "historical file". This is how it should be done. The name of the original file should not be changed.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment I didn't know that. I guess I can't support this nomination, then, but that hardly makes sense because I was the one who suggested this apparently illicit action. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment There is no moment, nor at any level, a malicious intension, it is an awkwardness succeeded by enthusiasm. We can leave it as it is. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment I have taken the liberty of removing the unwanted part of the scope, which previously had a strikethrough. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)