Commons:Featured picture candidates/W5.jpg

File:W5.jpg, withdrawn

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2008 at 10:27:59

•  Info created by NASA/JPL - uploaded by Anrie - nominated by Anrie -- Anrie (talk) 10:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Info A heart-shaped nebula, W5, about 6,500 light-years away in the constellation Cassiopeia. What's special about this picture (besides being heart-shaped and stunning), is that it also contains some of the best evidence yet for the triggered star-formation theory.
•  Support -- Anrie (talk) 10:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose amazing picture, but I can't support it with the huge black frame/watermark. I guess that picture on the bottom of the page [1] would be better when cropped (and higher resolution) -- Gorgo (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Gorgo --ianaré (talk) 01:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment - I replaced the file with a cropped version. Hopefully this will address your concerns. Anrie (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment replacing an image while voting is still running is not the preferred way, better is to create a spearate version. I cropped a new image with the original data (see below), so it's now 21mp instead of only 4 ;). -- Gorgo (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment. Well, seeing as how there were only two opposing votes and no supporting ones (excluding my own), I used my discretion this time. Also, I hate having more than one edit of an image in a nomination, so I will rather support your version, meaning that  Anrie (talk) 09:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment As this is just one of millions of images, it is (in my opinion) in need of a more descriptive filename. Even for being just one of 1000's of deep space astronomy images, it is still in need of a more descriptive filename. -- carol (talk) 03:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

result: withdrawn -- Lycaon (talk) 21:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

File:W5 cropped.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2009 at 15:48:55

•  Info created by NASA/JPL high-res and cropped version of above image. --Gorgo (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it's quite a stunning image. Unfortunately it has quality problems at the bottom, but cropping them would also mean losing the small nebula in the middle. -- Gorgo (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --ianaré (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Man On Mission (talk) 08:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - As per my original nomination. This one is, however, of higher resolution. Anrie (talk) 09:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment As this is just one of millions of images, it is (in my opinion) in need of a more descriptive filename. Even for being just one of 1000's of deep space astronomy images, it is still in need of a more descriptive filename. -- carol (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Georgez (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --FilWriter 15:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--imehling (talk) 17:59, 01 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. -- Lycaon (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)