Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Viandox.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Viandox.jpg, delete as Copyright violation
[edit]
Info Ad for Viandox from the sixties revealed by the workings in the parisian subway. created by Romanceor - uploaded by Romanceor - nominated by B.navez --B.navez 16:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Support --B.navez 16:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Neutral In general an interesting photo. Is there also a photo with a bit more of the surroundings? Where do you have that info about the ad from? It is not in the pictures description...it should get added there. --AngMoKio 19:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Info The info is available on the "Viandox" entry of the French Wikipedia. I've just added it to the description. Romanceor 23:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Charlessauer 06:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support - amazing...--Sabri76 19:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting but not very valuable.
Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first! --Beyond silence 13:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- In what sense is this photo not valuable? --AngMoKio 09:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Romary 17:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Question Is this copyright infringment, since it is from the 60's? -- Ram-Man 22:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)- Oppose
as per Beyond Silence.Also, a tad unsharp, even scaled down. -- Ram-Man 04:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)- In what sense is this photo not valuable? --AngMoKio 09:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Arguing over value takes a lot of effort and upon a second closer look at this, the picture is of a wall and should be spectacularly sharp, but is nowhere near FP quality. The fact that it came from an SLR implies that the error is the photographer alone, likely because of the too slow shutter speed blurring the image. For reproductions of artwork, this comes nowhere close to the acceptable standard. -- Ram-Man 22:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I agree on the technical quality. But still I think it is a well spotted scene...not everyone has an eye for such shots. --AngMoKio 07:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- I completely disagree with these technical arguments which I think are not valuable because this is a poster, in a tunnel, without flash and furthermore matter is printed with low resolution (how should it be sharper?). So, this is a very good picture technically, artistically and historically. But Guillom is right, there is violation copyright. Sorry --B.navez 18:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Arguing over value takes a lot of effort and upon a second closer look at this, the picture is of a wall and should be spectacularly sharp, but is nowhere near FP quality. The fact that it came from an SLR implies that the error is the photographer alone, likely because of the too slow shutter speed blurring the image. For reproductions of artwork, this comes nowhere close to the acceptable standard. -- Ram-Man 22:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- In what sense is this photo not valuable? --AngMoKio 09:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose and delete as Copyright violation, see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Viandox.jpg. guillom 08:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
