Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:USA monument valley UT.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:USA monument valley UT.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Info created - uploaded by Dschwen - nominated by Arad --Arad 01:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Arad 01:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic --Tony Wills 10:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support dito --Benjamint444 11:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support - MPF 12:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Digon3 15:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry to spoil the party but this is not good enough. I love the composition and colours. Unfortunately the image quality is far from excelent: visible noise (and some artifacts) in the sky and dark parts, not enough detail. Alvesgaspar 21:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- CommentAaah, but this is FP not QI ;-) --Tony Wills 23:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- What the??! Being FPC means that quality is even more stringently scrutinised! --Fir0002
www 06:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Fir, I sometimes really think you take this whole FPC thing too seriously. He was joking! And please, fix your signing style. A link in your signature really makes it hard for other users. --Arad 20:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor lighting, fairly uninteresting composition, image quality problems. This is not anywhere near the best picture of Monument Valley available. The cloud formation is certainly impressive, but it's not that uncommon in the area. ~ trialsanderrors 01:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above and is too dark. --Fir0002 www 06:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with opposers. FP should have the quality of the QIs, and additional it should have artistic qualities. This one has artistic quality, but its not that good to slur over the technical flaws --Simonizer 08:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose poor quality picture --Karelj 22:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful landscape, nice colors! --Floflo 20:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per trials and Simonizer, with whose understanding of the QI/FP distinction I am inclined to concur. Jahiegel 08:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)