Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tsim Sha Tsui Ferry Pier.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Tsim Sha Tsui Ferry Pier.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2008 at 15:35:06
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Baycrest -- Baycrest(Talk) 15:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Baycrest(Talk) 15:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose, too much sky and dull light. --Aqwis (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Correct picture, not special enough to be featurable -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, of lack of wow. –Dilaudid 08:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- C'mon guys ... seriously. Lack of wow is not a guideline violation. --norro 16:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- "Wow" is a summary of the FP guidelines and is what separates FPs from QIs. --Aqwis (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. Can you me show me the lack of wow in the picture? Is there any chance that you can depict the clear guideline violation that is the requirement for FPX? Or the other way round: If I say there is enough wow in the picture, are there any facts to disprove that? --norro 19:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just to make it clear - I don't support FPXing this picture. As for "the "amount" of wow in this picture" - you just cannot objectively judge a photograph like that, sorry. Of course, you are entitled to your opinion that there is enough wow in the picture, just as everyone else are entitled to their opinion that there is not. Whether or not a picture is good or evokes emotions (the so-called "wow") is purely a matter of taste - although it's undeniable that some pictures have wider appeal - e.g. evokes emotions in more people - than others. --Aqwis (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is not our job to show anyone the lack of wow in a picture. It's the candidate picture's job to show its wow to us. –Dilaudid 15:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. Can you me show me the lack of wow in the picture? Is there any chance that you can depict the clear guideline violation that is the requirement for FPX? Or the other way round: If I say there is enough wow in the picture, are there any facts to disprove that? --norro 19:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- "Wow" is a summary of the FP guidelines and is what separates FPs from QIs. --Aqwis (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- C'mon guys ... seriously. Lack of wow is not a guideline violation. --norro 16:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support --norro 19:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar --S23678 (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow and please look at image talk page. Seriously, I even Opposed this in the Chinese Wikipedia. --Mr. Mario (talk) 01:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks wow factor. How do you turn this on (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
result: 2 supports, 6 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)