Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:London-07.07.2005-trapped underground.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:London-07.07.2005-trapped_underground.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Nominate
LoopZilla 2005-07-07 21:29:54 (UTC)
- Support LoopZilla 2005-07-07 21:29:54 (UTC)
- Oppose bah! --PedroPVZ 8 July 2005 00:09 (UTC)
- Neutral --FML hi 8 July 2005 04:49 (UTC) I like, but I see this image in the newspapper. It's free?
- Yes, it is. It's licensed unter Creative Commons License. norro 21:30, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Get_It • 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
- Neutral Surely there are better pictures than this one of that event? --Komencanto 8 July 2005 13:51 (UTC)
- Well considering this one was making the front pages, apparently not. ed g2s • talk 19:43, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:53 (UTC)
- Neutral --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:26 (UTC)
- Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:51 (UTC)
- Oppose - A man, a hand and blurry darkness? Thuresson 8 July 2005 17:09 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:18 (UTC)
- Oppose Ack Thuresson norro 9 July 2005 15:23 (UTC)
- Support - for what it represents, an attempt to capture a possibly life-threatening situation by a regular citizen, enabled by unbiquitous technology. Knowing the full story of the London events gives this photo life, and I believe that this makes it in some ways more valuable than professional photography because it allows the viewer to feel that "It could have been me taking that photo". Historically valuable.--Eloquence 23:16, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Elgaard 02:26:57, 2005-07-14 (UTC)
- Support --SylwiaS 21:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose definitely no featured picture -- Gorgo 17:55, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- Support --.:Ajvol:. 08:36, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose I doesn't need to be featured just because its got historical value. very low quality. Foolip 13:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --TarmoK 12:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 10 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 17:10, 23 July 2005 (UTC)