Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Joueur de flute du rajasthan.jpg

Image:Joueur de flute du rajasthan.jpg

Original

•  Info created by Username - uploaded by Username - nominated by Username --194.254.62.29 20:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --194.254.62.29 20:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: too small. Please read the guidelines.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

MichaelMaggs 20:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

result: Per guidelines => not featured. Richard Bartz 21:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit, not featured

•  InfoI uploaded a larger version to meet the standards. Vassil 20:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC) Created by ConyJaro - uploaded by Vassil - nominated by Vassil --Vassil 20:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Vassil is uploader and nominator of this version. Lycaon 21:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Support It's a pity that the baskets are cropped, otherwise it's a good picture with interesting details. Vassil 20:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Upscaling a picture to fulfil size requirements is an odd thing to do. It does not add information, it introduces artefacts, it increases file sizes (bits) and it reduces quality. Lycaon 21:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry for the bad identification :-( it's the first time for me that I do this! But I like this picture so much ;-) 194.254.62.29 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info - Sorry but voting from anonymous users in not allowed. Please sign in and try again. Alvesgaspar 23:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 21:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lycaon. Any image can be artificially upscaled to 'meet the requirement', but doing so only degrades the image, and makes an unacceptable one even more unacceptable. --MichaelMaggs 21:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Lycaon. -- Slaunger 21:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Very nice scenario --Richard Bartz 22:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Images should never be upscaled. As above. --Digon3 ^talk 22:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Due to upscale. The camera used for this shot supports resolutions up to 2048 x 1536, so I guess there should exist a higher non upscaled version, unless the camera was set to a lower resolution. /Daniel78 07:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Richard Bartz 21:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)