Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Jorge Volpi - FIL05.JPG

Image:Jorge Volpi - FIL05.JPG, not featured

•  Info created by User:Soljaguar - uploaded by User:Soljaguar - nominated by User:Soljaguar --Soljaguar 12:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Soljaguar 12:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, please see guidelines. 1600x1200 is too small. The minimum requirement, unless there are special reasons to the contrary, is 2Mpx. --MichaelMaggs 13:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> That´s a good reason. Thank you.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm not crazy about the pic because of the stuff in the background and the water bottle, but I think automatically throwing out a picture because it's 1.92 Mpx instead of 2.00 Mpx is plain silly. I mean, seriously - 0.08 megapixels???? Soljaguar, you should just photoshop this baby up to 1633x1225 (keeps everything in proportion) and let the pic be judged on merit rather than petty technicalities. JaGa 17:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

There is a workaround on this silly thing. Just vote with a support and the show goes on :). --Richard Bartz 18:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> I threw the pic not for a mere 1.92 size, but just for the try of the FP contest. However, thank you JaGal for the second -and valuable- part of your comment. Thank you Richard. --Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment On the basis of recent votes here, upscaling is one thing that will definitely disqualify a picture. The way to get around the minimum size guideline is for the contributor to upload a version at higher resolution. The probable reason this one is so small it's that it's been downsampled, which many voters here don't approve of unless it's done for a technical (as opposed to a commercial) reason. --MichaelMaggs 17:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> I just uploaded it the original size. Thank you for your comment.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment event if the picture was 10mpx, the take is not fortunate. Absolutely not. Dantadd✉ 21:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> I´d have love to knew more about the reason of your comment. However, thank you.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Support I don't actually think the picture is FP worthy, but not because of the resolution (at such a tight crop I think the resolution is fine). Since removing FPX requires support, I'm supporting. I think the template should be changed, see Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#Change to FPX template. Dori | Talk 22:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> Thank you very much for your comment. The picture was uploaded as is, with no manipulation at all.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unfortunate amount of noise and i dont like the composition very much --Richard Bartz 22:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> Thank you very much.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Taken on the wrong moment, subject is looking on the table. --che 23:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

> Thank you for your comment. I think the moment depends on what someone is looking for in it. I have a couple more pictures of the same series, where the writer is looking up. However, I wanted this one, since he is a great reader and I wanted to remind that to those who where in the same room that day and enjoyed his reading.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination > Thank you again everybody for your comments.--Soljaguar 08:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

result: Withdrawn => not featured. Simonizer 21:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)